ase share them.
>
> Also, how well does Xdoclet work with dyna forms?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 11:49 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: ActionForm vs. DynaActionForm
>
&g
Hubert Rabago wrote:
That would only get you an object to hold values, right? You'd still
need to put validation rules somewhere. With an ActionForm, its
validate() method should contain this. Of course, it could delegate
it somewhere, but you'd be maintaining that, instead.
I assume you mea
That would only get you an object to hold values, right? You'd still
need to put validation rules somewhere. With an ActionForm, its
validate() method should contain this. Of course, it could delegate
it somewhere, but you'd be maintaining that, instead.
This also would reduce ActionForm reuse,
First, let me say that I understand how Dyna forms work, but I don't use
them. If I'm way off here or suggesting something that isn't possible,
or already has been done, take it easy on me. :)
I was suggesting that perhaps a parser could read a JSP that contains
, and treat that form as a docum
with dyna forms?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 11:49 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: ActionForm vs. DynaActionForm
>
> I didn't mean "better than either one". I mea
Any other takers? If any Struts committers have opinions, please share them.
Also, how well does Xdoclet work with dyna forms?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 11:49 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: ActionForm vs
Can you elaborate?
Do you mean a utility that would parse incoming form values and then
map them to my business objects? :)
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:48:33 -0500, Erik Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't mean "better than either one". I meant "better than building
> your own ActionForm by
ase explain when dyna forms do not meet requirements. I am
> very interested in knowing their limitations, as I already know their
> benefits.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hubert Rabago [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, Fe
I didn't mean "better than either one". I meant "better than building
your own ActionForm by hand", and thus better than using Dyna form.
Erik
Erik Weber wrote:
Wouldn't a parser handler that could build an ActionForm skeleton
during a parse of a form JSP be better than either one?
Erik
Hubert
Wouldn't a parser handler that could build an ActionForm skeleton during
a parse of a form JSP be better than either one?
Erik
Hubert Rabago wrote:
I really would not give too much weight to the blog you linked to. If
you've read the comments of the readers, you'd see that some of his
arguments
The DynaActionForm is great if you like to write scripting type code. I'd
rather use encapsulation. Otherwise you'll have the same code repeated in a
lot of your actions.
-Original Message-
From: Benedict, Paul C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 11:04 AM
To: stru
imitations, as I already know their
benefits.
Thanks,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Hubert Rabago [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 11:33 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: ActionForm vs. DynaActionForm
I really would not give too much weight to the blog yo
I really would not give too much weight to the blog you linked to. If
you've read the comments of the readers, you'd see that some of his
arguments aren't really that strong, and some are even totally
incorrect.
Personally, I use DynaActionForm for each form that it can support.
Once I have a fo
13 matches
Mail list logo
