--- Tom Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the idea here is that you'd want to do
> something like:
>
> bundle_key="preferences>
>
>
Yeah, I realized that after I posted.
I should probably have a cooling-off or 5-day waiting
period before I'm allowed to post, really :/
d.
ow
to not have duplicate code with the Anchor and Url components.
Joe
On 2/4/07, Gonçalo Luiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Even though the method I'm using to produce links is working, I think
of it like a little bit awkward.
An example of what I'm saying is:
">
wrote:
--- Gonçalo Luiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
">
Is there a more "elegant" way of producing links
that does not involve this "sub-tag" schema ?
Like what? That's how the tag works, it has an
href and the text is the body.
If you want to aut
--- Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's an open ticket for this issue
> https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1517
> > ">
> >
> >
There's obvious base functionality like we're talking
about here (an action or value or href, optional text
from properties, styling, etc.) but
--- Gonçalo Luiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ">
>
>
>
> Is there a more "elegant" way of producing links
> that does not involve this "sub-tag" schema ?
Like what? That's how the tag works, it has an
href and the text is the body
ying is:
">
Is there a more "elegant" way of producing links that does not involve
this "sub-tag" schema ?
Thank you.
Best Regards,
--
Gonçalo Luiz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fo
Hello,
Even though the method I'm using to produce links is working, I think
of it like a little bit awkward.
An example of what I'm saying is:
">
Is there a more "elegant" way of producing links that does not involve
this "sub-tag" schema ?
Tha
7 matches
Mail list logo
