ext:
http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Struts2-Pre-populate-form-with-values-from-a-session-bean-tp3487976p4300972.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsub
Dave Newton wrote:
--- On Tue, 12/9/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
getmFoo() as getter works just fine here with S2 as it did
since almost eight years with S1.
Which version of S2? I'll re-check when I get home and follow up.
Thanks,
Dave
--
--- On Tue, 12/9/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> getmFoo() as getter works just fine here with S2 as it did
> since almost eight years with S1.
Which version of S2? I'll re-check when I get home and follow up.
Thanks,
Dave
-
Dave Newton wrote:
--- On Tue, 12/9/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
[...] I was guessing in that direction already but wanted
a guru to confirm this first, which is what you did.
Minus the "guru" part ;)
That's our naming spec and we have decided to also use
this spec for bean pr
--- On Tue, 12/9/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
> [...] I was guessing in that direction already but wanted
> a guru to confirm this first, which is what you did.
Minus the "guru" part ;)
> That's our naming spec and we have decided to also use
> this spec for bean property names, hence the ge
Dave,
your comments helped me resolve the issue, see my comments below.
Dave Newton wrote:
A couple of comments, although with the configuration provided I'm not getting
as far as you are.
--- On Thu, 12/4/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
name="com.blah.blurp"
ex
A couple of comments, although with the configuration provided I'm not getting
as far as you are.
--- On Thu, 12/4/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
>
> name="com.blah.blurp"
>extends="struts-default">
> class="com.blah.blurp.actions2.AddAction">
>
Dave Newton wrote:
--- On Thu, 12/4/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
I'm using Struts 2.0.14, any chance that this is a fixed bug?
If it is unknown, i'll go file a bug then.
I dunno; I've used this pattern on a few apps (ScopedModelDriven, too) so I'm
skeptical it's a bug. Could you p
--- On Thu, 12/4/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
> I'm using Struts 2.0.14, any chance that this is a fixed bug?
> If it is unknown, i'll go file a bug then.
I dunno; I've used this pattern on a few apps (ScopedModelDriven, too) so I'm
skeptical it's a bug. Could you post the config for the act
Dave Newton wrote:
--- On Thu, 12/4/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
The form field is only pre-filled if i explicitly use
value="#session...", but with this, [...]
If the action implements modelDriven, and the getModel() call returns the
session bean under mySessionBeanKey, then yo
--- On Thu, 12/4/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
> value="#session.mySessionBeanKey.theValue"/>
>
> The form field is only pre-filled if i explicitly use
> value="#session...", but with this, [...]
If the action implements modelDriven, and the getModel() call returns the
session bean under myS
Hi!
We were previously using Struts1 session scope form beans to achieve
what we feel was rather natural: We frequently have a pattern were a
user needs to change some settings in some model bean stored in a
persistent storage. With Struts1, we had a jsp with a tag
that was bound to an actio
Ok, thanks Hubert - this confirms that I will have to do what I want another way.
Cheers
Conrad
Conrad CramptonSoftware Solutions ManagerForce Headquarters11 Edinburgh SquareSutton RoadMaidstoneME15 9BZ01622 653283 (ext)19-3283 (internal)07814 011752 (mobile)>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20/01/05 15:36
Our views align on the use of session scoped beans, however, it seems
that session scope is what meets your needs.
> So this essentially means that nested objects are worthless as you can't
> keep reference to child objects that you populate in the middle tier for the
> trip around to the UI and
Conrad CramptonSoftware Solutions ManagerForce Headquarters11 Edinburgh SquareSutton RoadMaidstoneME15 9BZ01622 653283 (ext)19-3283 (internal)07814 011752 (mobile)>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19/01/05 16:07:49 >>>
> So the question is this - how do I retain values of nested properties that> aren't r
> So the question is this - how do I retain values of nested properties that
> aren't required to be (or cannot be) represented in the jsp?
The only values that you'll get when the form is submitted are the
values that the form has.
If you have values that you want to submit with the form, but do
Hi,
The list archive search doesn't appear to work to forgive me if this is a simple and already answered topic.
I have an actionform that has an object as a property - Premises premises, and a jsp that uses .
When I use createPremises.jsp all is ok and the values for premises get through to my
The ActionForm you specified in your ActionMapping in
struts-config.xml under the name attribute, e.g. "logonForm", is
available to you in the execute method. Just cast your ActionForm
parameter to the particular form you used with the Action, e.g., if
you have
public ActionForward execute(Action
From: "Roland Carlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> When you say that the newinsurance.jsp "just see it" where do you store
> "it"? In request.setAttribute() with some key? Session?
You don't have to store it anywhere... it's already there. In the 'execute'
method signature, you are given a _reference_
The framework handles it. Here's a rough sequence of events:
1) The Struts servlet receives a request for /newinsurance.do
2) The request processor consults the mapping information and sees
that there should be an InsuranceBean instance in the request
3) It checks the standard request attri
Hi Jeff!
When you say that the newinsurance.jsp "just see it" where do you store
"it"? In request.setAttribute() with some key? Session?
I'm using DynaValidatorBean but I guess that it should work in a simular
way.
Thanks in advance
Roland Carlsson
Den 04-11-11 14.14, skrev "Jeff Beal" <[EMAIL
Every JSP page in my application is going to have two actions associated
with it. One action will always be called prior to displaying the JSP
page. The other will be called to process the user's input. In the
struts-config, both of these actions are configured with the same form
bean. Thus
.
>
>
> Original Message Follows
> From: Roland Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Pre-populate form
> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004
.
Original Message Follows
From: Roland Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Pre-populate form
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:07:38 +0100
Hi!
I am looking for a b
Hi!
I am looking for a better way to pre-populate my (html)forms when building
to allow the users to edit data from a database.
I know that I can create an populate a DynaValidatorBean but I don't know
where to put it so that I can use it from my (html)from.
Thanks in advance
Roland Carlsson
Ps
25 matches
Mail list logo
