Re: NoResult - write response in the Action

2009-11-05 Thread Dale Newfield
Siddiq Syed wrote: What will be the view in this case ? This is a special return value reserved primarily for actions that generate their own output directly, and used to indicate that the framework should not dispatch to any view (as the view has already been sent to the requester). -Dale

Re: NoResult - write response in the Action

2009-11-05 Thread Brian Thompson
t;> useful for actions that are handling the view in another fashion > >> like redirect. > >> > >> There is a reference to it in the "Result Configuration" documentation > as > >> well: > >> http://struts.apache.org/2.1.8/docs/result-configuration.html > >> >

Re: NoResult - write response in the Action

2009-11-05 Thread Siddiq Syed
>> >> There is a reference to it in the "Result Configuration" documentation as >> well: >> http://struts.apache.org/2.1.8/docs/result-configuration.html >> >> Later, >> -- >> Haroon Rafique >> >> >> >> -----------------

Re: NoResult - write response in the Action

2009-11-05 Thread Dale Newfield
Greg Lindholm wrote: Looking at the code it appears that (null) and "none" are treated the same and both cause results processing to be skipped. Thanks! and the annotated view: http://svn.opensymphony.com/fisheye/browse/xwork/trunk/src/java/com/opensymphony/xwork2/DefaultActionInvocation.java?

Re: NoResult - write response in the Action

2009-11-04 Thread Greg Lindholm
Hey Admins... I don't seem to be able to edit http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/result-configuration.html is there a problem with the wiki (or is it just down for maintenance)? On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Greg Lindholm wrote: > Thanks. I did see the javadoc for NONE (after you suggested usi

Re: NoResult - write response in the Action

2009-11-04 Thread Greg Lindholm
Thanks. I did see the javadoc for NONE (after you suggested using it). It just seemed to me to be a little vague considering that NONE really is a special case as it is the only result that is 'functional' where the others are more like 'convention'. In any case it certainly wasn't a place I thoug

Re: NoResult - write response in the Action

2009-11-04 Thread Haroon Rafique
On Today at 9:42am, GL=>Greg Lindholm wrote: GL> Thanks that did the trick. GL> GL> Where did you learn about the NONE result? Is it documented somewhere? GL> Hi Greg, I first saw it in the 2.0.11 source code when trying to create a new result type. The javadoc for it was quite helpful:

Re: NoResult - write response in the Action

2009-11-04 Thread Brian Thompson
Yes. See: http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/api/com/opensymphony/xwork/ActionSupport.html http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/api/com/opensymphony/xwork/Action.html#NONE -Brian On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Greg Lindholm wrote: > Thanks that did the trick. > > Where did you learn about the NONE

Re: NoResult - write response in the Action

2009-11-04 Thread Greg Lindholm
Thanks that did the trick. Where did you learn about the NONE result? Is it documented somewhere? On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Haroon Rafique wrote: > On Today at 5:13pm, GL=>Greg Lindholm wrote: > > GL> I have a situation where I want to fully handle the result in the > Action > GL> includi

Re: NoResult - write response in the Action

2009-11-03 Thread Haroon Rafique
On Today at 5:13pm, GL=>Greg Lindholm wrote: GL> I have a situation where I want to fully handle the result in the Action GL> including writing the response to the HttpServletResponse. GL> return ActionSupport.NONE? GL> GL> What's the best way to handle this so there is no further results p

NoResult - write response in the Action

2009-11-03 Thread Greg Lindholm
I have a situation where I want to fully handle the result in the Action including writing the response to the HttpServletResponse. What's the best way to handle this so there is no further results processing after the execute() method ends? Is there a way to disable results processing from withi