t; procedure I correspondingly
> > > have a Java parser to parser the result set. I
> > currently name these
> > > classes the same name as stored procedure.
> > Example, Csm5RRP (this is the
> > > stored procedure na
they have to change the names for
> all the stored
> > procedure, to makes things meaningful, I have to
> rename all my java
> > classes. -- this is really a pain.
> >
> > Do you guys have an argument on this? Is this a
> good naming
s have an argument on this? Is this a good naming practice? If
> not, what will be the naming convention in this situation?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
argument on this? Is this a good naming practice? If
not, what will be the naming convention in this situation?
About the only thing people seem to 100% agree upon about naming
conventions is that you should probably have one, that you should
document it if you do, and that if you have one, STICK TO
naming practice? If
not, what will be the naming convention in this situation?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim, you're kidding, right? The original post had nothing to do with
variable names and specifically related to bean property names. The key
question from the original post is:
Is there a property naming convention to be followed in STRUTS
The answer is, yes. In general, property names f
orresponding JSP I get the
error message not able to find the corresponding getter method for
property eCoupon
The moment I changed the property name to ecoupon and made the
necessary adjustments within the ActionForm all began to work well.
Is there a property naming convention to be followe
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 12:51 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: ??? property naming convention problem
>
>
> Is that supposed to be some sort of bluff? What do vari
Quoting Jim Barrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kris Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 10:45 AM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: ??? property naming convention
me",firstNameIn);
}
Here firstName is a property of MyBean that can be used in a jsp :
-Original Message-
From: Jim Barrows [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 1:28 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: ??? property naming convention problem
>
Quoting Jim Barrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daniel Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 7:52 AM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: ??? property naming conv
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 10:45 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: ??? property naming convention problem
>
>
> Quoting Jim Barrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
from ECoupon->getECoupon and
> therefore
> > eCoupon->geteCoupon
> >
> > However the spec doesnt say that this should be a reversible process, so
> why
> > not eCoupon->getECoupon
> >
> > Daniel.
> >
> >
> >>-Original
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 7:52 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: ??? property naming convention problem
>
>
> This is confusing. The bean spec /
error message not able to find the corresponding getter method for
property eCoupon
The moment I changed the property name to ecoupon and made the
necessary adjustments within the ActionForm all began to work well.
Is there a property naming convention to be followed in STRUTS
With thanks
n->getECoupon
Daniel.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 December 2004 14:01
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: ??? property naming convention problem
>
>
> Sure is mate!. Its all in the javabean specs
>
oupon->geteCoupon
However the spec doesnt say that this should be a reversible process, so why
not eCoupon->getECoupon
Daniel.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 December 2004 14:01
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: ??? property naming conv
find the corresponding getter method for
property eCoupon
The moment I changed the property name to ecoupon and made the
necessary adjustments within the ActionForm all began to work well.
Is there a property naming convention to be followed in STRUTS
With thanks and Regards
Vinod Easaw
18 matches
Mail list logo