RE: JSTL vs Struts-el

2004-04-19 Thread Mike Duffy
use jstl. > > So our tags were actually then since it was the only struts > library we needed. > > -Original Message- > From: Bill Siggelkow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 3:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: JSTL vs

RE: JSTL vs Struts-el

2004-04-19 Thread Hookom, Jacob
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: JSTL vs Struts-el Josh Holtzman wrote: > Would someone be willing to elaborate on why I might want to use Struts-el > rather than JSTL? > Are these alternative technologies, or complimentary? They are complimentary technologies. There is little overlap

Re: JSTL vs Struts-el

2004-04-19 Thread Bill Siggelkow
Josh Holtzman wrote: Would someone be willing to elaborate on why I might want to use Struts-el rather than JSTL? Are these alternative technologies, or complimentary? They are complimentary technologies. There is little overlap. struts-el enables Struts tags that do not have JSTL equivalents to

JSTL vs Struts-el

2004-04-19 Thread Josh Holtzman
Hello all, Would someone be willing to elaborate on why I might want to use Struts-el rather than JSTL? Are these alternative technologies, or complimentary? If I begin using JSTL with my current struts application will I need to change any of the syntax in my current struts tags? I