On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:36:37 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig,
>
>
> > With Creator (which has nice support for consuming web
> > services), I used Google's published API for doing searches
> > via a SOAP request to build a little demo program -- with the
> > text fie
Craig,
> With Creator (which has nice support for consuming web
> services), I used Google's published API for doing searches
> via a SOAP request to build a little demo program -- with the
> text field for the query string, and the results table, on
> the same page. I only wanted to display
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:18:53 -0400, Sean Schofield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fair enough. By the way, I'm not bagging on the UI components in any
> way. The one that looks the most intriguing to me is the "rendered"
> attribute that comes with the various widgets. That attribute combined
> w
Craig McClanahan wrote:
The *standard* UI components weren't meant to be compelling -- they
were meant to give people an opportunity to actually explore the APIs
without having anything except a JSF implementation.
Fair enough. By the way, I'm not bagging on the UI components in any
way. The
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:02:07 -0400, Sean Schofield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> Are the UI widgets of JSF really that compelling?
The *standard* UI components weren't meant to be compelling -- they
were meant to give people an opportunity to actually explore the APIs
without having anything ex
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:29:56 -0400, Sean Schofield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been doing some reading recently on JSF and I have a few comments and
> questions.
>
> At first I thought JSF would focus mostly on the "V" in MVC. But after doing some
> reading on this, it seems like JSF re
Hubert Rabago wrote:
Yes. Some even believe the navigation rules of JSF is easier to
understand than those of Struts.
I haven't finished exploring all of the nav features of JSF, but I tend
to agree with this comment. Navigation seems to me to be one of the
more awkward aspects of Struts. I
On 12 Oct 2004, at 17:57, Hubert Rabago wrote:
Lots of people more qualified than me to respond to your questions,
but I know a little bit about the theory and can give you a preview of
what they'll likely say.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:29:56 -0400, Sean Schofield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have bee
Geez, my writing can be very confusing.
> Whose focus? Struts users miss out on lots of developments outside
> Struts, but they miss out on Struts progress as well.
I meant, those not using Struts would miss out on Struts developments
as well. Maybe it's time for me to get some lunch.
Hubert
Lots of people more qualified than me to respond to your questions,
but I know a little bit about the theory and can give you a preview of
what they'll likely say.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:29:56 -0400, Sean Schofield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been doing some reading recently on JSF and I
I have been doing some reading recently on JSF and I have a few comments and questions.
At first I thought JSF would focus mostly on the "V" in MVC. But after doing some
reading on this, it seems like JSF really provides the "M" and "C" as well. Is this
accurate?
It seems possible to combine
11 matches
Mail list logo
