Mike Elliott wrote the following on 7/18/2005 3:18 PM:
I came up with another solution which might be worthy of
consideration. Instead of using arrays, extend a list with the
desired get( int ) method and use that list instead:
public class SkillActionForm extends ActionForm {
protecte
I've stumbled across a similar problem that I'm trying to find the
Struts solution for.
I have a form which allows users to add a dynamic amount of rows (via
a button that says "Add Row") and then submit the form with as little
or many rows as they wish. Can a form bean be setup using collections
On 7/18/05, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still not totally clear where the problem is, since I'm not sure
> what Session has to do with the initial setup of the form.
The difference is unobvious, I admit, but this is what I was thinking
of: If I use a session bean, I can do some
Andrew Tomaka wrote the following on 7/18/2005 2:13 PM:
I have a form which allows users to add a dynamic amount of rows (via
a button that says "Add Row") and then submit the form with as little
or many rows as they wish. Can a form bean be setup using collections
instead of other object types
Michael Jouravlev wrote the following on 7/18/2005 3:59 PM:
ActionForm.reset() for session-scoped forms, ActionForm.ActionForm()
for request-scoped forms. I do not remeber, if reset() is called for
request-scoped forms.
Yes, reset is always called when the form submits. I know I mentioned in
On 7/18/05, Mike Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I use a session bean, I can do some sort of setup (from an
> Action) on its initial creation, including creating the list of
> contained objects. That can't happen if it's in request scope because
> there is no chance to invoke the setup bef
Mike Elliott wrote the following on 7/18/2005 10:55 AM:
I've been beating my head against this all weekend to no avail. I
understand how to do this in session scope, but don't know if it's
even possible in request scope.
As I understand things (which may be wrong), when the form is
submitted (
On 7/18/05, Mike Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well I could see for large forms with nested data it might not be a
> > great idea to keep these around in the Session. I 'try' to stick to
> > using the Request when I can but I don't bend over backwards like
> > some do on this list to a
> Well I could see for large forms with nested data it might not be a
> great idea to keep these around in the Session. I 'try' to stick to
> using the Request when I can but I don't bend over backwards like
> some do on this list to avoid the Session.. I'm in "The Session is your
> friend" ca
On 7/18/05, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Jouravlev wrote the following on 7/18/2005 3:59 PM:
>
> > ActionForm.reset() for session-scoped forms, ActionForm.ActionForm()
> > for request-scoped forms. I do not remeber, if reset() is called for
> > request-scoped forms.
>
> Yes,
just found 10,000 ways that won't work."-- Thomas
Edison
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Elliott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: Iterate over list in in list in form bean.
There are ways to resolve this, see this page on the wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogLazyList
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Elliott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 3:55 PM
On 7/13/05, Jörg Eichhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks for the
On 7/13/05, Jörg Eichhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks for the hint and example. I've choosen the nested way to do this,
> because i
> think this makes the jsp code more readable.
>
> I there a way to do the same using request scope?
> When i do this i get an exception because the collecti
On 7/13/05, Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not Friday, but I'd like to now what you need the JSTL tags for? What
> is it, what you can't do with standart (struts without EL) tags? What do you
> need EL for?
>
> Regards
> Leon :-)
How about "I want to fork Struts into StrutsWork
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Rick Reumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2005 00:25
> An: Struts Users Mailing List
> Betreff: Re: Iterate over list in in list in form bean.
>
> Wendy Smoak wrote the following on 7/13/2005 6:14
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Rick Reumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2005 00:25
> An: Struts Users Mailing List
> Betreff: Re: Iterate over list in in list in form bean.
>
> Wendy Smoak wrote the following on 7/13/2005 6:14
On 7/13/05, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wendy Smoak wrote the following on 7/13/2005 6:14 PM:
>
> > Struts-EL gives you the ability to use expressions in the Struts tags. I
> > think it's more than a convenience... for example, how would you rewrite the
> > code above if you could n
Wendy Smoak wrote the following on 7/13/2005 6:14 PM:
Struts-EL gives you the ability to use expressions in the Struts tags. I
think it's more than a convenience... for example, how would you rewrite the
code above if you could not use an expression in the 'value' attribute?
Struts-EL tags ar
From: "Michael Jouravlev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> is Struts-EL tag, is not it? I would prefer to use JSTL
> only. I think I can do that. But it this case, what Struts-EL is for?
> For convenience only?
Struts-EL gives you the ability to use expressions in the Struts ta
On 7/13/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Michael Jouravlev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> Showing side by side examples from
> >>Struts "classic",
> >>Struts-EL + JSTL 1.0, and
> >>Struts + JSP 2.0 + JSTL 1.1
> >> is on my TODO list
>
> > Does the above mean that "Stru
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
On 7/12/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
Does the above mean that "Struts + JSP 1.2 + JSTL 1.0" (no Struts-EL)
is not possible?
I don't know about 'possible' but JSP 1.2 includes JSTL 1.1, so why would
you want to?
http://jak
From: "Michael Jouravlev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Showing side by side examples from
>>Struts "classic",
>>Struts-EL + JSTL 1.0, and
>>Struts + JSP 2.0 + JSTL 1.1
>> is on my TODO list
> Does the above mean that "Struts + JSP 1.2 + JSTL 1.0" (no Struts-EL)
> is not possible?
(Is this
Hi Martin,
i didn't think of the users who deleted previous posts.
Here you can find it:
http://www.mail-archive.com/user%40struts.apache.org/msg30141.html
--On Mittwoch, 13. Juli 2005 09:59 -0400 Martin Gainty
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jörg
Hard to answer a reference to a previous posti
On 7/12/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> > Does the above mean that "Struts + JSP 1.2 + JSTL 1.0" (no Struts-EL)
> > is not possible?
>
> I don't know about 'possible' but JSP 1.2 includes JSTL 1.1, so why would
> you want to?
http://jakarta.apache.org/tag
the referenced info..
Vielen Danke,
Martin
- Original Message -
From: "Jörg Eichhorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 4:47 AM
Subject: Re: Iterate over list in in list in form bean.
Hello,
thanks for the hint
Hello,
thanks for the hint and example. I've choosen the nested way to do this,
because i
think this makes the jsp code more readable.
I there a way to do the same using request scope?
When i do this i get an exception because the collection is not re-filled
anymore.
In my previous example th
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
Does the above mean that "Struts + JSP 1.2 + JSTL 1.0" (no Struts-EL)
is not possible?
I don't know about 'possible' but JSP 1.2 includes JSTL 1.1, so why would
you want to?
L.
--
Laurie, Open Source advocate, Java geek and novice blogger:
http://www.holoweb.net/~lau
Wendy Smoak wrote the following on 7/12/2005 7:48 PM:
From: "Rick Reumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here's an example from a demo app that I keep meaning
to post to show how it can be done using either the nested or regular
JSTL tags...
Please do! Showing side by side examples from
Struts "cl
On 7/12/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Rick Reumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Here's an example from a demo app that I keep meaning
> > to post to show how it can be done using either the nested or regular
> > JSTL tags...
>
> Please do! Showing side by side examples from
From: "Rick Reumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Here's an example from a demo app that I keep meaning
> to post to show how it can be done using either the nested or regular
> JSTL tags...
Please do! Showing side by side examples from
Struts "classic",
Struts-EL + JSTL 1.0, and
Struts + JSP
Wendy Smoak wrote the following on 7/12/2005 7:12 PM:
From: "Jörg Eichhorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
i have a form bean with a list property of complex object which also
contains a list of objects. When iterating over the first list and using
indexed elements, then values of the first list are trans
From: "Jörg Eichhorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> i have a form bean with a list property of complex object which also
> contains a list of objects. When iterating over the first list and using
> indexed elements, then values of the first list are transferred back when
> submitting the form. The values o
Hi all,
i have a form bean with a list property of complex object which also
contains a list of objects. When iterating over the first list and using
indexed elements, then values of the first list are transferred back when
submitting the form. The values of the inner list is displayed correct
33 matches
Mail list logo
