Re: Is this a BUG in S2

2007-05-24 Thread tom tom
Hi, if the action string is being evaluated in the URL tag what does it output the expression as it is, If we have the same expression in value attribute it does evaluate, That is where we are doubtful. In portal mode the action attribute does convert the string to portal string where as value d

Re: Is this a BUG in S2

2007-05-23 Thread Jeromy Evans
In the simple case, this: and this: would be identical. You can also use the tag to include request parameters. You can create any URL you need using the value attribute and params. You referenced portal in your email so you might be using this in a mode I haven't tried. Looking at the

Re: Is this a BUG in S2

2007-05-23 Thread tom tom
Yes you are right, Even though action attribute doesnt get evaluated value attribute does, but that is of no use as it does not create the URL string to suite with Portal env. The biggest concern is why the action attrbute of URL tag doesnt evaluate. that is following doesnt work

Re: Is this a BUG in S2

2007-05-23 Thread Dave Newton
--- tom tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > for the second one there is no href > attribute for the URL tag hence doesnt work. The "value" attribute creates the href if the "action" attribute isn't used. d. ___

Re: Is this a BUG in S2

2007-05-23 Thread tom tom
Hi, Thanks for the reply, I tried both but with no luck, Option 1 as stated I gave $actionName but doesnt evaluate and for the second one there is no href attribute for the URL tag hence doesnt work. I tried various combinations like c:out, ${actionName}, ${testID.actionName} and also %{actionNa

Re: Is this a BUG in S2

2007-05-22 Thread Jeromy Evans
I haven't tried to use a dynamic action name like that so can't comment on whether its a bug or feature, but one of these options should work: 1. Try using the ${} notation without the c:out (I can't find the reference for this approach but it's somewhere on the wiki) 2. Alternatively, work

Is this a BUG in S2

2007-05-22 Thread tom tom
Hi, We are experiencing that action attribute of the . . Is there any way to overcome this kind of requirements. Thanks __