Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-29 Thread Kevin Clifton
> > James Mitchell > > > Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist > > > EdgeTech, Inc. > > > 678.910.8017 > > > AIM: jmitchtx > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Dakota Jack
e - > > From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 11:14 AM > > Subject: [OT] Re: Hiding .do > > > > >I forgot this about Struts 1.2.

Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Craig McClanahan
ginal Message - > From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 11:14 AM > Subject: [OT] Re: Hiding .do > > >I forgot this about Struts 1.2.4, James. Good p

Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Dakota Jack
e - > From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:48 AM > Subject: Re: Hiding .do > > > James' condition, viz. "if you've coded your app with

RE: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Chappell, Simon P
sers Mailing List; Dakota Jack >Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do > > >What about *.spankMe ? (Think I might have lost that client) > > > >-- >James Mitchell >Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist >EdgeTech, Inc. >678.910.8017 >AIM: jmitchtx > >-

Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread James Mitchell
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 11:14 AM Subject: [OT] Re: Hiding .do I forgot this about Struts 1.2.4, James. Good point. I think your thing with the marketing people is funny. While I am certain it was not so funny for you at that time, I would have liked to be a p

[OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Dakota Jack
angelist > EdgeTech, Inc. > 678.910.8017 > AIM: jmitchtx > > - Original Message - > From: "Chaikin, Yaakov Y." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:32

Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread James Mitchell
sage - From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:48 AM Subject: Re: Hiding .do James' condition, viz. "if you've coded your app without hard references to '.d

Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Dakota Jack
nc. > 678.910.8017 > AIM: jmitchtx > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Chaikin, Yaakov Y." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "StrutsUser (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:06 AM > Subject: Hiding .do >

Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread James Mitchell
technology behind it.GEZ!! -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: "Chaikin, Yaakov Y." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL P

Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Tuncay Baskan
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:32:30 -0400, Chaikin, Yaakov Y. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James, > > Is that really true? > > Are you saying that Struts custom tags automatically pick up their extension > from the controller servlet mapping in web.xml? > > Hmm... I was under the impression that it was

RE: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Chaikin, Yaakov Y.
ing List Subject: Re: Hiding .do If you've coded your app without hard references to ".do", then you only need to change the web.xml file and all links/forms will be changed. For some fun, try changing to *.aspx and give a demo to your boss!! -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / O

Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread James Mitchell
t EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: "Chaikin, Yaakov Y." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "StrutsUser (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:06 AM Subject: Hiding .do Hi, Could someone either explain the steps

Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Chaikin, Yaakov Y.
Hi, Could someone either explain the steps or point me to a web page that explains how to develop/deploy a Struts based app without the user having to see the ".do" in the URLs but still take advantage of the Struts custom tags? Thanks, Yaakov. ---