Dear all ,
I have used Execute and Wait interceptor for my data search. wait page is
show the data found currently. but the problem is the page is refreshed
since i used http meta tag to update the current state.
i want to make the wait page AJAX. then without refreshing the page i can
use the
Hi ,
Iam beginner in Struts2,
iam having query on Execute and wait Interceptor ,
my code flow is like this
Login->Wait Interceptor->Menu/Fail.jsp
I added Interceptor in Struts.xml
Wait.jsp
menude
I¹m having trouble getting the execute and wait interceptor to work as
needed.
We have a process that in almost all cases either takes about 6 seconds to
complete or 40 seconds to complete. I added a delay parameter to my
execAndWait configuration of 1 which I meant thought it would wait 10
I have to build a list of display items from a legacy system which takes a
while to process.
I¹ve set up the execute and wait interceptor and that part of it is working
well.
Where I¹m running into problems is when the long running process is complete
and sitemesh. My decorator file has the
Burak Doğruöz wrote:
I don't think that it can be done with an ajax approach. With ajax or not,
concurrent requests for the same action name returns first action's result.
I tried this simple scenario with an action which outputs its query
parameter. I also added a thread.sleep in execute method
I don't think that it can be done with an ajax approach. With ajax or not,
concurrent requests for the same action name returns first action's result.
I tried this simple scenario with an action which outputs its query
parameter. I also added a thread.sleep in execute method to gain extra time
to
--- On Mon, 7/21/08, Burak Doğruöz wrote:
> The constraint here is about ExecAndWaitInterceptor storing
> and returning multiple copies of one certain action. This
> constraint is already in the documentation. We are looking
> for a turn around.
I was referring to the better solution, Jeremy's Aja
The constraint here is about ExecAndWaitInterceptor storing and returning
multiple copies of one certain action. This constraint is already in the
documentation. We are looking for a turn around.
For example if we open 2 browsers (which share the same session) and call
same action (which has ExecA
So, how to override this ExecAndWiatInterceptor behaviour? Is it possible to
map by some key other than action name?
If we use wildcards while defining action mapping, can we bypass this
constraint? This way we can call myAction1, myAction2 and myActionRandomN
which trigger myAction.action. Does E
--- On Mon, 7/21/08, Burak Doğruöz wrote:
> I think, even with an ajax approach, concurrent requests
> for same action would result in unexpected output as these
> actions are stored by same action name at background.
Each request would get its own action instance. The DOM element being updated
Burak Doğruöz wrote:
Thanks for your response,
I think, even with an ajax approach, concurrent requests for same action
would result in unexpected output as these actions are stored by same action
name at background. So in fact this is not a presentation constraint but a
processing constraint. W
Thanks for your response,
I think, even with an ajax approach, concurrent requests for same action
would result in unexpected output as these actions are stored by same action
name at background. So in fact this is not a presentation constraint but a
processing constraint. We can neither prevent c
is reason.
HTH,
regards,
Giovanni
Burak Doğruöz wrote:
Hi,
Our application lets user to run 2 (or more) copies of same action at the
same time (possibly with different parameters) in a frameset.
In execute and wait interceptor documentation (
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/execute-and-wait-interce
Burak Doğruöz wrote:
Hi,
Our application lets user to run 2 (or more) copies of same action at the
same time (possibly with different parameters) in a frameset.
In execute and wait interceptor documentation (
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/execute-and-wait-interceptor.html), it
says that
Hi,
Our application lets user to run 2 (or more) copies of same action at the
same time (possibly with different parameters) in a frameset.
In execute and wait interceptor documentation (
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/execute-and-wait-interceptor.html), it
says that execute and wait
Hi,
Does anyone have any experience of using the execute and wait interceptor in
a clustered environment.
I see the interceptor put the BackgroundProcess object in the session. This
object has a reference to among other things the action. If the app server
is using a DB to share session
mojoRising wrote:
I am using the Execute and Wait Interceptor on my login action. This action
needs to access the HTTPRequest object so that it can get the HTTPSessionId,
and the request headers and store all of this in the database as well as
putting the userObject in the session itself
I am using the Execute and Wait Interceptor on my login action. This action
needs to access the HTTPRequest object so that it can get the HTTPSessionId,
and the request headers and store all of this in the database as well as
putting the userObject in the session itself.
Documentation says that
Greetings to all,
i have implemented the execute and wait capability of struts2. The first
time is ran everything is smooth. The browser (firefox) url contains
instead of "&" , "&" generated by the tag. If i try to
refresh the browser everything gets mixed up
19 matches
Mail list logo