in advance!
Paulo Alvim
Powerlogic - Brazil
-Mensagem original-
De: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 25 de novembro de 2004 15:18
Para: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: [struts] Re: Dynamically adding an ActionMapping
You will no
ould be easier to embed the different
open source projects within one another.
Just my 2 cents...
Regards...djsuarez
-Original Message-
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 3:01 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Along those lines, you might want to check out the backport of JSR 166
(java.util.concurrent):
http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/dcl/util/backport-util-concurrent/
And perhaps specifically ConcurrentHashMap:
http://tinyurl.com/6c98r
Craig McClanahan wrote:
Cool ... this looks like a much better solutio
Cool ... this looks like a much better solution to the problem that
FastHashMap tried to solve. And I trust the implementors of this
library a *heck* of a lot more than I trust myself (I wrote
FastHashMap originally) to get all the nitpicky details right.
Craig
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:17:11 +13
Just for a laugh, I'll post this... I had just typed up the following
response, when it dawned on me exactly why the problem is on the read
side. I think I was subconsciously thinking that locking the HashMap
during the write would prevent any read from occurring, this is
obviously not the cas
Craig McClanahan wrote:
This is *exactly* where the problem lies. If one looks inside the
implementation of HashMap, one sees that there are times when the
internal data structures are being modified, and are in a potentially
inconsistent state that would corrupt a read operation happening on a
si
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:53:55 -0500, Frank W. Zammetti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I agree completely with your point about maintainability and
> testability (I can't think of a single situation where I would ever
> consider dynamic configuration modification), I'm interested in how this
> mi
While I agree completely with your point about maintainability and
testability (I can't think of a single situation where I would ever
consider dynamic configuration modification), I'm interested in how this
might be allowed anyway...
Wouldn't it be possible to create a thread-safe modification
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:21:01 -0500, Chaikin, Yaakov Y.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig,
>
> What is the reason the configuration gets "frozen"? I don't mean to ask
> about the mechanics of how it's frozen. I am just curious as to why freeze
> it and not let it be dynamically updated during appl
From: Chaikin, Yaakov Y. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 11:21 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Dynamically adding an ActionMapping
Craig,
What is the reason the configuration gets "frozen"? I don't mean to ask
about the mecha
om: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 1:18 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dynamically adding an ActionMapping
You will not be able to do this in a ServletContextListener, because
that gets executed before the Struts servlet has
on about dynamically adding an
> ActionMapping. I would like to do this at application startup through my
> StartupListener (courtesy of Matt Raible's AppFuse). I'm really only
> interested in adding a few simple ForwardActions.
Hi all -
I haven't been able to locate much information about dynamically adding an
ActionMapping. I would like to do this at application startup through my
StartupListener (courtesy of Matt Raible's AppFuse). I'm really only
interested in adding a few simple ForwardActions
Hi all -
I haven't been able to locate much information about dynamically adding an
ActionMapping. I would like to do this at application startup through my
StartupListener (courtesy of Matt Raible's AppFuse). I'm really only
interested in adding a few simple ForwardActions
14 matches
Mail list logo
