Re: Clarification Reg bean:include

2005-08-17 Thread Leon Rosenberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. August 2005 08:57 > An: user@struts.apache.org > Betreff: Clarification Reg bean:include > > Hi all, > Is bean:include thread safe? > In our proj we were using bean:include to include alternative > jsp's based on some co

Re: Clarification Reg bean:include

2005-08-17 Thread GRamani
Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/17/2005 02:33:03 PM: > Laurie Harper wrote: > > > sajith kumar wrote: > > > >> In our proj we were using bean:include to include alternative jsp's > >> based on some conditions thru action class > > I would also ask how was replaced by > and sinc

Re: Clarification Reg bean:include

2005-08-17 Thread Dave Newton
Laurie Harper wrote: sajith kumar wrote: In our proj we were using bean:include to include alternative jsp's based on some conditions thru action class But when Concurrent users were acessing the system the application didnt respond We changed our logic by replacing bean:include with logic:eq

Re: Clarification Reg bean:include

2005-08-17 Thread Laurie Harper
sajith kumar wrote: Hi all, Is bean:include thread safe? In our proj we were using bean:include to include alternative jsp's based on some conditions thru action class But when Concurrent users were acessing the system the application didnt respond We changed our logic by replacing bean:include

Clarification Reg bean:include

2005-08-16 Thread sajith kumar
Hi all, Is bean:include thread safe? In our proj we were using bean:include to include alternative jsp's based on some conditions thru action class But when Concurrent users were acessing the system the application didnt respond We changed our logic by replacing bean:include with logic:equal and j