Thanks everyone for your replies. I didn't know the wildcard matching
feature in action mappings. With this feature and map-backed ActionForms
now I can do more or less what I wanted to do.
Regards,
Diego.
Joe Germuska wrote:
At 12:39 PM +0100 2/21/05, Diego Manilla Suárez wrote:
Hi! I'm trying
Or use an action mapping that matches "/*". I use them with
MappingDispatchAction to match "/*/*" where the first is the action
class and the second is the function to call.
Don
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:40:17 -0500, David G. Friedman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Diego,
>
> Here is an idea: You c
Diego,
Here is an idea: You could always set your on-the-fly actions under a
module. Then you could use the unknown="true" attribute to route all
unmatched /module/*.do mappings to your new Action, which handles the lookup
and dynamic dispatching to the appropriate pages/actions, probably via a m
At 12:39 PM +0100 2/21/05, Diego Manilla Suárez wrote:
Hi! I'm trying to add an ActionMapping
definition dinamically (using
ModuleConfig.addActionConfig method), but I get
an IllegalStateException (configuration is
frozen). Is there a way to do what I want?
Well, you haven't really explained wh
It can be done, but I suspect everyone on the list will tell you not to
do it, and for very good reasons.
However, I'm one of those "here's your rope sir, try not to hang
yourself with it" kind of guys, so here's how...
The ModuleConfigImpl has a member "configured". This is what determines
i
Hi! I'm trying to add an ActionMapping definition dinamically (using
ModuleConfig.addActionConfig method), but I get an IllegalStateException
(configuration is frozen). Is there a way to do what I want?
Thanks in advance.
-
To u
6 matches
Mail list logo
