Re: About OGNL multi-threading contention

Darren James wrote: actually struts is currently using ongl 2.6.11 correct? In fact the problem that you reference here http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141, seems to indicate it was the 2.6.11 version of the OGNL jar that introduced the problem. Can someone verify? I would second the

Re: About OGNL multi-threading contention

actually struts is currently using ongl 2.6.11 correct? In fact the problem that you reference here http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141, seems to indicate it was the 2.6.11 version of the OGNL jar that introduced the problem. Can someone verify? I would second the idea that "this is a

Re: About OGNL multi-threading contention

There is a ticket open for the next version of Struts 2, 2.1.2, that will upgrade OGNL. The new version requires Struts 2 and XWork code changes, so it will take some time. Please vote or add any additional information to the Struts issue: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2527 Don On

About OGNL multi-threading contention

Hello, We've been testing an application in a production environment and found a serious contention problem when the number of simultaneous requests grows. The problem seems to be related with the use of static synchronized blocks in OGNL code. I've found a related issue in OGNL (http://jir