Leon Rosenberg wrote:
I think Java is acceptable for Pretty Large Projects, with
Large Numbers
of developers, especially if they're Geographically Distant. I'm
struggling to come up with a 10x20 program that would benefit
from being
written in Java that wouldn't suck, and I _like_ many pa
Leon Rosenberg wrote:
I'm struggling to come up with a 10x20 program that would benefit
from being written in Java that wouldn't suck, and I _like_ many parts of OO!
http://vip8prod.messe-berlin.de/messe/execute/enShow?unit=Hall+5.1&prj=
That's pretty neat; I like it.
I'm skeptical it
I think Java is acceptable for Pretty Large Projects, with
> Large Numbers
> of developers, especially if they're Geographically Distant. I'm
> struggling to come up with a 10x20 program that would benefit
> from being
> written in Java that wouldn't suck, and I _like_ many parts of OO!
http:
I think Java is acceptable for Pretty Large Projects, with
> Large Numbers
> of developers, especially if they're Geographically Distant. I'm
> struggling to come up with a 10x20 program that would benefit
> from being
> written in Java that wouldn't suck, and I _like_ many parts of OO!
http:
Leon Rosenberg wrote:
As I wrote in the answer to dave: c is not c++. The main problem of c++ was
actually, that they kept all the c-shit (yes powerful, but absolutely
unmaintenable stuff ) in the language.
I don't know where you're getting that "unmaintainable" bit from.
A printer company
> On 6/1/05, Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *snip*
> > Would you be able to code them with c? Forget it.
>
> Actually, I suspect that alot of these have been coded with C/C++.
As I wrote in the answer to dave: c is not c++. The main problem of c++ was
actually, that they kept all the
> On 6/1/05, Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *snip*
> > Would you be able to code them with c? Forget it.
>
> Actually, I suspect that alot of these have been coded with C/C++.
As I wrote in the answer to dave: c is not c++. The main problem of c++ was
actually, that they kept all the
Leon Rosenberg wrote:
* What's a "modern" language, anyway? What features does a "modern"
language have? I don't think Java is as widely used as it is
because it's interesting or powerful, it was just a better
C++ with marketing.
Java is actually the first component-oriented language.
>
> >Modern OSes, office suites or business software.
> >Modern guis, with integrated media support, integrated audio/video
> >broad- and unicasts, animations, sounds, and so on...
> >
> >Would you be able to code them with c? Forget it.
> >
> >
> Why wouldn't I? We used to code most anythi
>
> >Modern OSes, office suites or business software.
> >Modern guis, with integrated media support, integrated audio/video
> >broad- and unicasts, animations, sounds, and so on...
> >
> >Would you be able to code them with c? Forget it.
> >
> >
> Why wouldn't I? We used to code most anythi
Leon Rosenberg wrote:
We make far more complicated programms in far less time and for lesser cost.
"Complicated" is a pretty loaded term... I don't see much complication
in the majority of web apps. Big, sure. Complicated? Sometimes. The most
complicated stuff I've worked on lately is rules
>
> One major problem lies with how programmers are educated
> today. A lot of schools teach a language or a design
> philosophy but rarely are in-depth enough to actually breed
> the abstract skills necessary for the programmer to become
> useful. It's a shame, really. I went to college in
>
>
> One major problem lies with how programmers are educated
> today. A lot of schools teach a language or a design
> philosophy but rarely are in-depth enough to actually breed
> the abstract skills necessary for the programmer to become
> useful. It's a shame, really. I went to college in
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
