Re: [struts] Slow performance with Struts2

2008-07-03 Thread Dale Newfield
yorlick kilroy wrote: firstly ognl 2.6.11 was faster than 2.7.2 with or without javassist everytime, no matter how often I executed the test. Thank you for doing this test! I guess I'll be following your lead reverting back to 2.6.11 myself. -Dale -

Re: [struts] Slow performance with Struts2

2008-07-03 Thread yorlick kilroy
Ok, I started a new test with ognl 2.6.11 vs ognl 2.7.2 vs ognl 2.7.2 + javassist Request-response time was stopped with Yslow firefox plugin for firefox 3 firstly ognl 2.6.11 was faster than 2.7.2 with or without javassist everytime, no matter how often I executed the test. I couldn't notice any

Re: [struts] Slow performance with Struts2

2008-07-02 Thread Dale Newfield
yorlick kilroy wrote: I'm sorry but I only just read about javassist now, as I had no idea what it is nor does. How do I include it? do I just drop it in my lib folder like I do with other Struts plugins? How do I use it? and what exactly does it do? Yes, just drop the .jar into your WEB-INF/li

Re: [struts] Slow performance with Struts2

2008-07-02 Thread yorlick kilroy
I'm sorry but I only just read about javassist now, as I had no idea what it is nor does. How do I include it? do I just drop it in my lib folder like I do with other Struts plugins? How do I use it? and what exactly does it do? On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:22 AM, DNewfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [struts] Slow performance with Struts2

2008-06-30 Thread DNewfield
yorlick kilroy wrote: > thx! you made my day :-) that did the trick! > replacing freemarker 2.3.8 with 2.3.13 speeded up my application by almost > 100% Could you re-run your OGNL 2.6.11 vs. 2.7.2 tests with freemarker 2.3.13 in place, and see if the "upgrade" is still a performance "downgrade" a

Re: [struts] Slow performance with Struts2

2008-06-26 Thread yorlick kilroy
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:25 AM, yorlick kilroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Al, > > thx! you made my day :-) that did the trick! > replacing freemarker 2.3.8 with 2.3.13 speeded up my application by almost > 100% > It still doesn't come anywhere near my old struts2 application but I guess > it

Re: [struts] Slow performance with Struts2

2008-06-26 Thread yorlick kilroy
Hi Al, thx! you made my day :-) that did the trick! replacing freemarker 2.3.8 with 2.3.13 speeded up my application by almost 100% It still doesn't come anywhere near my old struts2 application but I guess its a fairly small trade-off when considering what struts2 has to offer. --- joe On Thu,

Re: [struts] Slow performance with Struts2

2008-06-26 Thread Al Sutton
If your benchmark uses multiple threads throw in a freemarker upgrade to 2.3.13 and have another spin :). One thing you might want to bear in mind is that if you're using a persistance framework there maybe some back end fetching taking place between a.b.c and a.b.c.d. Even though you write si

Re: [struts] Slow performance with Struts2

2008-06-26 Thread yorlick kilroy
I replaced OGNL 2.6.11 with the latest 2.7.2 Version. I did a bit of benchmarking comparing the two and it absolutely surprised me, that 2.7.2 in some cases is almost twice as slow as 2.6.11 The test scenario: iterate a large java.util.List in a jsp. the List contains a pretty large tree of object

Re: [struts] Slow performance with Struts2

2008-06-25 Thread Dale Newfield
yorlick kilroy wrote: Still... the "problem" seems to be the OGNL implementation in struts2. I'm guessing here, but maybe your issues are related to: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141 Which has been pushed off in Xwork to 2.5: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-631 And which