Re: [shale] how MyFaces's component do layout

2006-03-20 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 3/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I cannot find the place to download Clay. > Does Clay exist inside Shale already? Yes. In the first few lines of documentation, it says Clay is similar to Tapestry > and Facelets. If there are available products to use, does Clay close

Re: [shale] how MyFaces's component do layout

2006-03-20 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 3/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As I find JSF has h:subview or other h: component, > can I use JSF component only such that I can do without Tiles? > If yes, should it be h:subview or other component? To be precise, JSF supports not . It is part of the core library

Re: [shale] how MyFaces's component do layout

2006-03-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I cannot find the place to download Clay. Does Clay exist inside Shale already? In the first few lines of documentation, it says Clay is similar to Tapestry and Facelets. If there are available products to use, does Clay closely clung to Shale or Struts? On 3/20/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [shale] how MyFaces's component do layout

2006-03-19 Thread Alexandre Poitras
I will let Gary or Craig answer this one but if you use Shale, Clay is your answer. On 3/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I find JSF has h:subview or other h: component, > can I use JSF component only such that I can do without Tiles? > If yes, should it be h:subview or oth

[shale] how MyFaces's component do layout

2006-03-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As I find JSF has h:subview or other h: component, can I use JSF component only such that I can do without Tiles? If yes, should it be h:subview or other component? Thanks