t;> need
>> >>>> to
>> >>>> do
>> >>>> this 3-4 times in a jsp...but we definitely should think about goat
>> >>>> sacrifices too.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Milan
>> >>&
--- On Thu, 8/28/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
> "Expensive", you got it. In terms of speed, of
> course, because I need to do this 3-4 times in a jsp...
Or you could do it once and use
Or use a map. Or an array in the first place. And of course you could put it in
the array in your action and use
;
> >>>
> >>>> "Expensive", you got it. In terms of speed, of course, because I need
> >>>> to
> >>>> do
> >>>> this 3-4 times in a jsp...but we definitely should think about goat
> >>>> sacrifices too.
> >>>>
> >>
>>>> --
>>>> Milan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For a
If I had a solution I would give it to you faster than that :).
Maybe you need to approach the problem from a different angle (i.e.
display the data differently), or do some reworking in the action to put
the data in a more friendly format.
Milan Milanovic wrote:
If you had solution, I'm sur
And everything always has a price, even if you don't what it costs it
may still be the only way to get what you want.
georz1 wrote:
Probably not too expensive in terms of speed considering this has been going
on for 9 days now
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Milan Milanovic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>
>> "Expensive", you got it. In terms of speed, of course, because I need to
>> do
>> this 3-4 times in a jsp...but we definitely should think about goat
>> sacrifices too.
>>
>> --
>> Milan
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Probably not too expensive in terms of speed considering this has been going
on for 9 days now
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Milan Milanovic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> "Expensive", you got it. In terms of speed, of course, because I need to do
> this 3-4 times in a jsp...but we definitely s
gt;>> W: www.alsutton.com
>>>> B: alsutton.wordpress.com
>>>> T: twitter.com/alsutton
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&
i love this discussion.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If been using toArray recently so it's been kind of a necessity. Have you
> found a non-goat sacrificing optimisation?
>
>
> Jim Kiley wrote:
>
>> Have you bought any goats lately?
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 28
If been using toArray recently so it's been kind of a necessity. Have
you found a non-goat sacrificing optimisation?
Jim Kiley wrote:
Have you bought any goats lately?
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Define "expesive"... Do you mean expensive?, if so
Have you bought any goats lately?
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Define "expesive"... Do you mean expensive?, if so expensive in what terms;
> memory, speed, required goat sacrifices?
>
> Al.
>
> Milan Milanovic wrote:
>
>> toArray() ? It works, but it is
Define "expesive"... Do you mean expensive?, if so expensive in what
terms; memory, speed, required goat sacrifices?
Al.
Milan Milanovic wrote:
toArray() ? It works, but it is too expesive ?
Milan
newton.dave wrote:
--- On Thu, 8/28/08, Al Sutton wrote:
C... I love a puzzle..
--------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For
Interesting post I must say!
I would try this:
"share log"
2008/8/28, bhaarat Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> bahahaah @ making my data disappear!
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- On Thu, 8/28/08, Al Sutton wrote:
> > > C... I love a puzzle
bahahaah @ making my data disappear!
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- On Thu, 8/28/08, Al Sutton wrote:
> > C... I love a puzzle..
> >
> > Can you give us the 9 characters in an anagram??
>
> A rotary? (Plus two non-alpha, but it's already too
--- On Thu, 8/28/08, Al Sutton wrote:
> C... I love a puzzle..
>
> Can you give us the 9 characters in an anagram??
A rotary? (Plus two non-alpha, but it's already too easy now.)
Not having enough information sure is a pain, huh.
Dave
>
> Dave Newton wrote:
> > --- On Thu, 8/28/08, Mi
C... I love a puzzle..
Can you give us the 9 characters in an anagram??
Dave Newton wrote:
--- On Thu, 8/28/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
"9-character JSP trick", what is this ?
It's a clue that you could (potentially) solve [1] your issue by adding 9
characters to your JSP, wi
1] ObCaveat: it's untested with your particular data and implementation.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-S2--Iterate-throu
gt; >
>> > Dave
>> >
>> > --- On Wed, 8/27/08, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [S2] Iterate through two lists
>> >&g
> Dave
> > >
> > > --- On Wed, 8/27/08, Milan Milanovic
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> From: Milan Milanovic
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [S2] Iterate through
> two lists
> > >> To:
--- On Thu, 8/28/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
> "9-character JSP trick", what is this ?
It's a clue that you could (potentially) solve [1] your issue by adding 9
characters to your JSP, without having to change anything in the Java code. The
Set Javadocs may help.
Dave
[1] ObCaveat: it's unteste
er JSP
> trick
> > would probably work. The solution is left as an exercise for the reader.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > --- On Wed, 8/27/08, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
lan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [S2] Iterate through two lists
>> To: user@struts.apache.org
>> Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 4:50 PM
>> I'm using TreeSet and my set
in jsp in this way ?
> >
> > What would it mean to get the nth index of a set???
> Sets are unordered.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PRO
--
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-S2--Iterate-through-two-lists-tp19052842p19189459.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.
You managed three different taglib prefixes in one email; that's gotta be some
sort of record.
--- On Wed, 8/27/08, Martin Gainty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Martin Gainty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [S2] Iterate through two lists
> To: "Str
d Sender does not
endorse distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does
not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission.
> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:48:42 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [S2] Itera
--- On Wed, 8/27/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
> I don't understand this, what are you saying that I
> cannot use Set in jsp in this way ?
What would it mean to get the nth index of a set??? Sets are unordered.
Dave
-
To unsubscri
il: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-S2--Iterate-through-two-lists-tp19052842p19185642.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
--- On Tue, 8/26/08, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (And even if you can't or don't want to fix it on the server-side,
> it's a 9-character fix on the JSP side.)
(Although it's not likely to do what you want.)
Dave
-
--- On Tue, 8/26/08, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm...maybe it is a problem beacuse of Set (not List)?
Now, probably, you understand why I didn't think you were providing all the
information necessary to help you.
And you probably solved your own problem, so we're all... set. (A
ferences
>> between my code, which works fine, and yours, there's not much else to
>> say.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> --- On Tue, 8/26/08, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Subjec
> --- On Tue, 8/26/08, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [S2] Iterate through two lists
>> To: user@struts.apache.org
>> Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 11:13 AM
>> Dear Dave,
&
here's not much else to say.
Dave
--- On Tue, 8/26/08, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [S2] Iterate through two lists
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 11:13 AM
>
EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [S2] Iterate through two lists
>> To: user@struts.apache.org
>> Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 1:10 PM
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> here is complete jsp:
>>
>
...
I already knew the JSP that was causing the error.
Dave
--- On Mon, 8/25/08, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [S2] Iterate through two lists
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Date: Monday, August 25,
dn't use 's "name" attribute; I don't think
> it's necessary, although I don't know if the presence of it will cause the
> message to be parameterized incorrectly.)
>
> Dave
>
>
> ------------------
--- On Mon, 8/25/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
>
> <- HERE IT WORKS (order is recognized
> in session)!!
>
>
>value="#session.order.orderList[#rowstatus.index].price"/>
> <- HERE IT
> DOESN'T WORK - null value!
>
>
>
"IT" is two *entirely different
OTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [S2] Iterate through two lists
>> To: user@struts.apache.org
>> Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 11:30 AM
>> I tried this syntax when my "someObject" is
>> located in ac
Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [S2] Iterate through two lists
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 11:30 AM
> I tried this syntax when my "someObject" is
> located in
e that
> uses it, written while working on your problem.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--- On Sat, 8/23/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
> O.K. I'll try to find it. But I just think that this synax is no good:
>
>
You may *think* that, but the syntax is fine, and I have working code that uses
it, written while working on your problem.
Dave
---
message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-S2--Iterate-through-two-lists-tp19052842p19120556.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- On Fri, 8/22/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
> Where can I set levels DEBUG for S2, XWork and OGNL ?
Search the fine web for Java logging, possibly after checking what S2 has for
logging-oriented dependencies.
Dave
-
To unsubsc
--
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-S2--Iterate-through-two-lists-t
--- On Fri, 8/22/08, "Stephan Schröder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe the param tag tries to bind with the push tag and not
> with the text tag???
Oh, that makes sense, although it'd probably be better to not throw a huge
exception :/ Hopefully I'll have time to look in to that soon.
Dave
> If all you're trying to do is set message properties why are you bothering
> with the push?
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Looks good (if fruit1 is accessable bei a getter in the action class). Does it
work for you?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> I'm not sure why the push
--- On Thu, 8/21/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
> I have struts devMode on and logging works for Struts,
> i.e., I get all messages from Apache Tomcat and Struts
> in console. What do you mean by "logging turned up" ?
Set log levels to DEBUG for S2, XWork, and OGNL.
Did my solution work for you?
Da
debug message: when you say
> you have logging turned up, what, exactly, do you mean?
>
> I'm not sure why the push tag is causing the issue, though.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -----------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
--- On Thu, 8/21/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
> Tell me is this syntax good now for representing action
> class attribute called someObject?:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
*sigh*
Yes, "someObject" will access an action property named "someObject".
If all you're trying to do is set mess
lar, and so on).
>> >
>> > Do you still get the 500 using the correct OGNL
>> expression?
>> >
>> > Dave
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
n).
> >
> > Do you still get the 500 using the correct OGNL
> expression?
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additio
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-S2--Iterate-through-two-lists-tp19052842p19092268.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive a
--- On Thu, 8/21/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
> it is an object that contains list of Fruits, nothing else.
> Yes, it is located in action class and have get/set methods.
> newton.dave wrote:
>> What is "someObject"? Have you created it as
>> a named stack context variable?
The answer to my question
n Thu, 8/21/08, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [S2] Iterate through two lists
>> To: user@struts.apache.org
>> Date: Thursday, August 21, 2008, 11:41 AM
>> Dear Dave,
>&g
What is "someObject"? Have you created it as a named stack context variable?
Dave
--- On Thu, 8/21/08, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [S2] Iterate through two lists
> To: user@struts.apache.
---------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-S2--Iterate-through-two-lists-tp19052842p19091427.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- On Thu, 8/21/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
> I tried to adopt your solution, like this:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> but I get: Error loading 'myApp/showFruits.action'
> (500 Internal Server Error),
> and there is nothing in log.
I'd say something is wrong either in the action c
ot;)
>
> Maybe you forgot an '#' somewhere? How are fruit1,2 obtained?
>
> /Stephan
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
>> Von: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> An: user@struts.apache.org
>>
ephan
---- Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
> Von: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: user@struts.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [S2] Iterate through two lists
>
> Dear Dave,
>
> yes, I tried with index too, but it
er the syntax is completly right
>> but it should work like
>> > this:
>> >
>> > > status="rowstatus">
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > value="fruits2[#rowstatus.count]">
>> >
>> >
>
zu sparen!
> > Ideal für Modem und ISDN:
> http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
> >
> >
> -----------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-m
>
>
>
>
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/-S2--Iterate-through-two-lists-tp19052842p19052842.html
> --
> Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
> Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/g
I'm not sure whether the syntax is completly right but it should work like this:
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-S2--Iterate-through-two-lists-tp19052842p19052842.html
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekoste
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-S2--Iterate-through-two-lists-tp19052842p19052842.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
66 matches
Mail list logo
