Re: [OT] Re: Session Strategy (here's a filter)

2005-01-21 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:03:24 -0600, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps nowadays it is commonplace for people to make such posts, but > it has not always been the case - and it really should not be done. I > didn't invent the custom, I just follow it. Besides being a little overwrough

Re: [OT] Re: Session Strategy (here's a filter)

2005-01-21 Thread Eddie Bush
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:04:23 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frankly, I think that this thread was, until the sardonic and biting > interjection about "very poor etiquette", one of the better ones I've > seen recently. It is interesting that anyone could defend this > objection. (

Re: [OT] Re: Session Strategy (here's a filter)

2005-01-21 Thread Dakota Jack
Frankly, I think that this thread was, until the sardonic and biting interjection about "very poor etiquette", one of the better ones I've seen recently. It is interesting that anyone could defend this objection. (I should say that Hubert's offering is not seen as a "defense" but as informative.)

[OT] Re: Session Strategy (here's a filter)

2005-01-21 Thread Erik Weber
Jim Barrows wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:59:59 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry about posting code to the list if that is poor etiquette. I didn't know of that one. What's the reason for it? My code wasn't too lengthy and the email can easily be deleted by those that