Re: [OT] Re: Please reply to the mailing list, not to the person

2005-06-08 Thread Hubert Rabago
On 6/8/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How about... top posting and NOT trimming the previous post? ;) > I'm not sure I've encountered an email app where top posting was not the default. It'll probably be hard to convert entire populations to put their replies at the bottom if th

Re: [OT] Re: Please reply to the mailing list, not to the person

2005-06-08 Thread Woodchuck
hehe, i see your point. but i'm generally neutral on the top posting issue. it's nice because everything can be found in one post, esp. if you haven't been following and just jumped in to the latest post. but if you have been following the thread, then it's unnecessary. some threads take on a l

Re: [OT] Re: Please reply to the mailing list, not to the person

2005-06-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
woodchuck wrote: > while we're on the subject of mailing list rules/etiquette/pet peeves: How about... top posting and NOT trimming the previous post? ;) At least trim your posts. Please, do it for the archives if nothing else. There are so many posts that have the previous two, three, and more

[OT] Re: Please reply to the mailing list, not to the person

2005-06-08 Thread Woodchuck
while we're on the subject of mailing list rules/etiquette/pet peeves: i despise ppl who purposely post messages that are future dated so they remain at the top of your inbox messages list. this is the worst offense imho. i promptly delete these without hesitation. woodchuck --- Michael Joura