Nop.
Gabriel Belingueres-2 wrote:
>
> Did you tried iterating using JSTL's forEach tag?
>
> 2008/8/28, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> O.K. One more thing, is it possible to define an array in jsp, where I
>> will
>> call set.toArray() and then to use this array (without calling toA
--- On Thu, 8/28/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
> "Expensive", you got it. In terms of speed, of
> course, because I need to do this 3-4 times in a jsp...
Or you could do it once and use
Or use a map. Or an array in the first place. And of course you could put it in
the array in your action and use
Did you tried iterating using JSTL's forEach tag?
2008/8/28, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> O.K. One more thing, is it possible to define an array in jsp, where I will
> call set.toArray() and then to use this array (without calling toArray()
> every time) ?
>
> --
> Milan
>
>
>
> Al Sut
O.K. One more thing, is it possible to define an array in jsp, where I will
call set.toArray() and then to use this array (without calling toArray()
every time) ?
--
Milan
Al Sutton wrote:
>
> If I had a solution I would give it to you faster than that :).
>
> Maybe you need to approach the
If I had a solution I would give it to you faster than that :).
Maybe you need to approach the problem from a different angle (i.e.
display the data differently), or do some reworking in the action to put
the data in a more friendly format.
Milan Milanovic wrote:
If you had solution, I'm sur
And everything always has a price, even if you don't what it costs it
may still be the only way to get what you want.
georz1 wrote:
Probably not too expensive in terms of speed considering this has been going
on for 9 days now
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Milan Milanovic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you had solution, I'm sure that we would solve it in 5mins.
georz1 wrote:
>
> Probably not too expensive in terms of speed considering this has been
> going
> on for 9 days now
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Milan Milanovic
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>>
>> "Expensive", you got it.
Probably not too expensive in terms of speed considering this has been going
on for 9 days now
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Milan Milanovic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> "Expensive", you got it. In terms of speed, of course, because I need to do
> this 3-4 times in a jsp...but we definitely s
"Expensive", you got it. In terms of speed, of course, because I need to do
this 3-4 times in a jsp...but we definitely should think about goat
sacrifices too.
--
Milan
Al Sutton wrote:
>
> Define "expesive"... Do you mean expensive?, if so expensive in what
> terms; memory, speed, required
i love this discussion.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If been using toArray recently so it's been kind of a necessity. Have you
> found a non-goat sacrificing optimisation?
>
>
> Jim Kiley wrote:
>
>> Have you bought any goats lately?
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 28
If been using toArray recently so it's been kind of a necessity. Have
you found a non-goat sacrificing optimisation?
Jim Kiley wrote:
Have you bought any goats lately?
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Define "expesive"... Do you mean expensive?, if so
Have you bought any goats lately?
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Define "expesive"... Do you mean expensive?, if so expensive in what terms;
> memory, speed, required goat sacrifices?
>
> Al.
>
> Milan Milanovic wrote:
>
>> toArray() ? It works, but it is
Define "expesive"... Do you mean expensive?, if so expensive in what
terms; memory, speed, required goat sacrifices?
Al.
Milan Milanovic wrote:
toArray() ? It works, but it is too expesive ?
Milan
newton.dave wrote:
--- On Thu, 8/28/08, Al Sutton wrote:
C... I love a puzzle..
toArray() ? It works, but it is too expesive ?
Milan
newton.dave wrote:
>
> --- On Thu, 8/28/08, Al Sutton wrote:
>> C... I love a puzzle..
>>
>> Can you give us the 9 characters in an anagram??
>
> A rotary? (Plus two non-alpha, but it's already too easy now.)
>
> Not having enoug
Interesting post I must say!
I would try this:
"share log"
2008/8/28, bhaarat Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> bahahaah @ making my data disappear!
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- On Thu, 8/28/08, Al Sutton wrote:
> > > C... I love a puzzle
bahahaah @ making my data disappear!
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- On Thu, 8/28/08, Al Sutton wrote:
> > C... I love a puzzle..
> >
> > Can you give us the 9 characters in an anagram??
>
> A rotary? (Plus two non-alpha, but it's already too
--- On Thu, 8/28/08, Al Sutton wrote:
> C... I love a puzzle..
>
> Can you give us the 9 characters in an anagram??
A rotary? (Plus two non-alpha, but it's already too easy now.)
Not having enough information sure is a pain, huh.
Dave
>
> Dave Newton wrote:
> > --- On Thu, 8/28/08, Mi
C... I love a puzzle..
Can you give us the 9 characters in an anagram??
Dave Newton wrote:
--- On Thu, 8/28/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
"9-character JSP trick", what is this ?
It's a clue that you could (potentially) solve [1] your issue by adding 9
characters to your JSP, wi
Dave,
please add that 9 character here, please, I don't have time anymore to
search for "clues"...I'm stuck with this for days know :-.
newton.dave wrote:
>
> --- On Thu, 8/28/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
>> "9-character JSP trick", what is this ?
>
> It's a clue that you could (potentiall
gt; >
>> > Dave
>> >
>> > --- On Wed, 8/27/08, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [S2] Iterate through two lists
>> >&g
> Dave
> > >
> > > --- On Wed, 8/27/08, Milan Milanovic
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> From: Milan Milanovic
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [S2] Iterate through
> two lists
> > >> To:
--- On Thu, 8/28/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
> "9-character JSP trick", what is this ?
It's a clue that you could (potentially) solve [1] your issue by adding 9
characters to your JSP, without having to change anything in the Java code. The
Set Javadocs may help.
Dave
[1] ObCaveat: it's unteste
er JSP
> trick
> > would probably work. The solution is left as an exercise for the reader.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > --- On Wed, 8/27/08, Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
lan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> From: Milan Milanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [S2] Iterate through two lists
>> To: user@struts.apache.org
>> Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 4:50 PM
>> I'm using TreeSet and my set
: Re: [OT] Re: [S2] Iterate through two lists
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 4:50 PM
> I'm using TreeSet and my set objects are implementing
> Comparable interface,
> so they are ordered, aren't they ? Altough, I know that
> Set doesn't h
I'm using TreeSet and my set objects are implementing Comparable interface,
so they are ordered, aren't they ? Altough, I know that Set doesn't have
get(index) method.
O.K. I'll switch to List. Thx.
--
Milan
newton.dave wrote:
>
> --- On Wed, 8/27/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
>> I don't understa
--- On Wed, 8/27/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
> I don't understand this, what are you saying that I
> cannot use Set in jsp in this way ?
What would it mean to get the nth index of a set??? Sets are unordered.
Dave
-
To unsubscri
27 matches
Mail list logo
