On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:26 AM, stanlick wrote:
>
> Thanks Wes --
>
> First off, you are preaching to the choir bro. My question stems from the
> fact we have a small army of lawyers who stake their careers on looking in
> these rabbit holes and they are now asking me to help them dig! Telling
Thanks Wes --
First off, you are preaching to the choir bro. My question stems from the
fact we have a small army of lawyers who stake their careers on looking in
these rabbit holes and they are now asking me to help them dig! Telling
them not to concern themselves with this and that archive f
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:20 PM, stanlick wrote:
>
> Java != C?
>
> I realize the strength and duration of dependencies varies, and I understand
> the issues concerning use vs. redistribution. This notwithstanding, I am
> looking to satisfy the legal team and this requires collecting the sum of
>
FYI here are the Apache guidelines about licensing of Apache projects:
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
Ciao
Antonio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@s
Java != C?
I realize the strength and duration of dependencies varies, and I understand
the issues concerning use vs. redistribution. This notwithstanding, I am
looking to satisfy the legal team and this requires collecting the sum of
licenses from all the dependent archives before anything larg
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 15:40:43 stanlick wrote:
> If you look at the POM for Struts 2.1.6 there are many more dependencies
> than what show up running
> dependency:resolve. I verifies the default for scope because several of
> the dependencies are "test." It appears the default is all scopes,
If you look at the POM for Struts 2.1.6 there are many more dependencies than
what show up running
dependency:resolve. I verifies the default for scope because several of the
dependencies are "test." It appears the default is all scopes, so I am
wondering why I don't see them all when I run dep
well, for core, that should be it.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:57 PM, stanlick wrote:
>
> Well, since necessity is the mother of all invention and I have been asked
> for a magic bullet that poops out a stack of licenses, I am becoming more
> creative. Consider the following simple dependency:
>
>
Well, since necessity is the mother of all invention and I have been asked
for a magic bullet that poops out a stack of licenses, I am becoming more
creative. Consider the following simple dependency:
org.apache.struts
struts2-core
2.1.6
I am running mvn depende
All the dependencies that we have, must have a license that is
compatible with ASL 2. I don't know of any way to compile a list of
licenses used, that would be cool for a maven plugin.
musachy
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM, wrote:
> How does a company go about fleshing out the aspects of FOSS
How does a company go about fleshing out the aspects of FOSS without wasting
so many people's time? As FOSS gains in popularity, we are sinking in a
quagmire of manual research, analysis and legal license inspections. It
seems the FOSSology product will unpack compressed files and sniff around
fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
