Re: [OT] JSF-Shale-Facelets orthogonality

2006-01-13 Thread xzuma
On 1/13/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/12/06, David G. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Since no one else has answered, I'll give this a try: > > > > JSF is the base for everything you asked about. Only AFTER you are > > comfortable with JSF implementation (the

Re: [OT] JSF-Shale-Facelets orthogonality

2006-01-12 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 1/12/06, David G. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since no one else has answered, I'll give this a try: > > JSF is the base for everything you asked about. Only AFTER you are > comfortable with JSF implementation (the Sun JSF RI > or the MyFaces runtime) would I recommend you try Facele

RE: [OT] JSF-Shale-Facelets orthogonality

2006-01-12 Thread David G. Friedman
--Original Message- From: xzuma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 7:00 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: [OT] JSF-Shale-Facelets orthogonality Hello, I am reading discussions about the above three frameworks with one goal in mind, to find out whether JSF, Shale an

[OT] JSF-Shale-Facelets orthogonality

2006-01-12 Thread xzuma
Hello, I am reading discussions about the above three frameworks with one goal in mind, to find out whether JSF, Shale and Facelets are trully orthogonal. That is, if I go along any path, will be able to add any other framework lateron? How hard it is? What features of the frameworks are interlapp