Here's *one* way to achieve what you're after:
[left]
[right]
link1
link2
Courtesy of Eric Meyer
http://www.complexspiral.com/publications/containing-floats/
All that's different to your first example is the addition of an
additional 'float' on the outer div. This causes it to expand
On 1/3/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would even go so far as to ask, aside from the obvious benefit of being
> able to change the look and feel of a site by pointing to a new
> stylesheet, what is the problem with table-based layouts? Is the easy
> swapping of stylesheets th
Dave Newton wrote the following on 1/3/2006 1:01 PM:
I would just have a div with a table in it to avoid all those issues.
Right that's what I typically do. I just keep hearing about how you
should use divs for layouts, so every so often, I go back to wrestling
div junk and get frustrated.
Rick Reumann wrote:
What I just want as a test is a div with a border around it and then
two divs inside that div with text = One set of text aligned in a div
to the left, the other in a div text-aligned to the right. Then below
the main div some text:
I would just have a div with a table in
Have you tried the table, table-row and table-cell display properties? But
if that works, I'd just go back to tables.
No, you are not alone :)
I too have found it to be, shall we say, not as straight-forward as
table-based layouts. And I am relatively conversant in CSS (no guru or
anything, but I can usually make it to do what I want in the end).
Of course, the benefits are pretty obvious (anyone as yet unconvi
I always end up with nothing but trouble trying to position divs with
css that is a BREEZE to do with tables. css positioning is supposed to
be the layout savior yet my experience with it always ends up with
headaches - try something, see if it works, try something else, set if
it works. Oh and
7 matches
Mail list logo
