Re: [OT] Direct-to-DOM validation

2005-10-06 Thread Michael Jouravlev
Another nice form validation: http://www.themaninblue.com/writing/ Check out the section "Form Usability" (shame, it does not have anchor). I especially like the last two: "Inline error messages with real-time message updates to indicate corrections" and "Succinct display of errors, with correct fi

Re: [OT] Direct-to-DOM validation

2005-09-22 Thread Laurie Harper
Actually, I want to do exactly that; it's on my to-do list. I haven't looked at it at all, but when I do I'll be sure to post. L. Michael Jouravlev wrote: I like IceSoft's "Direct-to-DOM" buzzword ;-) The question is probably better suited for Commons mailing list, but because it is Struts-rel

Re: [OT] Direct-to-DOM validation

2005-09-22 Thread Leon Rosenberg
I am not sure that modifying the DOM is such a good idea. I mean, sure it works on some browsers, but not on all, so it's not "production-ready" (same problem as with ajaxtags). On 9/21/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like IceSoft's "Direct-to-DOM" buzzword ;-) The question is

[OT] Direct-to-DOM validation

2005-09-21 Thread Michael Jouravlev
I like IceSoft's "Direct-to-DOM" buzzword ;-) The question is probably better suited for Commons mailing list, but because it is Struts-related, I will ask it here. Have anyone tried or have heard of projects which display client-side validation messages directly in the page instead of popping up