Re: / and primitive properties

Sorry I just realize I didn't use the tag the right way. I had String literals in my list instead of the actual primitives/objects... Now of course it works just fine without any patching! Slowly, but I am getting there ;-) Torsten Torsten Römer schrieb: > I tried to use primitive types/arrays

/ and primitive properties

I tried to use primitive types/arrays of primitives as "name" property of and . It works fine, but the state is not maintained because the ContainUtil.compare() method returns false as it compares e.g. an Integer and a Sting using Object.equals(). Is there a reason why we can't use primitives li