2012/10/22 JOSE L MARTINEZ-AVIAL :
> I just created the issue:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3906
>
> I think I can implement part of this issue on my own. What do I need to do
> in order to collaborate in this?
Just prepare a patch and attach it to the issue with granting rights to
2012/10/22 Davis, Chad :
> Because the framework components, such as ActionSupport, are intended to be
> extended, correct?
Correct :-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
mobile +48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
-
> 2012/10/19 Davis, Chad :
> > Thanks man! I'll check it out this morning. I think the protected seems
> > like
> a great idea. It's an interesting question, whether to make such things
> protected or private.
>
> When this is a part of framework it should be protected. In apps mostly no ;
I just created the issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3906
I think I can implement part of this issue on my own. What do I need to do
in order to collaborate in this?
Thanks
JL
2012/10/22 Lukasz Lenart
> 2012/10/21 JOSE L MARTINEZ-AVIAL :
> > I just reviewed the code, and it se
2012/10/21 JOSE L MARTINEZ-AVIAL :
> I just reviewed the code, and it seems that the HttpHeaderResult only
> parses the parameters headers and errorMessage, but not the parameters
> status or error. I think it could be a nice thing to have. my workaround is
> to extend JSONResult incorporating the
2012/10/20 Srineel Mazumdar :
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your reply. However I still have some queries :
>
> 1) Why the namespace = path added ? I could have given /shop/editAccount.
> What difference it would have made ?
You should use namespaces as action should be just a simple labels, no
slashes. I
2012/10/20 Srineel Mazumdar :
> Also would like to add another thing :
>
> If I add the following line :
>
>
>
> then I think I do not need to add namespace in all the entries??
Yes
Regards
--
Łukasz
mobile +48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://c
2012/10/19 Davis, Chad :
> Thanks man! I'll check it out this morning. I think the protected seems
> like a great idea. It's an interesting question, whether to make such things
> protected or private.
When this is a part of framework it should be protected. In apps mostly no ;-)
Regards
--
8 matches
Mail list logo