Well, I figured out how to use the Logger framework while the S.o.p was not
working. Now I have both the logger messages and the sop working together.
I also found other debugging technique of using debug=browser (and other
options like xml) but that doesn't work. I think I should fork a separate
t
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Pratt [mailto:thechrispr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 18:48
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Iterating over a tree structure
>
> Give http://lmgtfy.com/?q=JSP+tag+file+support a shot.
> (*Chris*)
Thanks, I am learning somet
Give http://lmgtfy.com/?q=JSP+tag+file+support a shot.
(*Chris*)
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Pratt
> > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 18:18
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: Iterating over a tree structure
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Pratt
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 18:18
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Iterating over a tree structure
>
> Not exactly, a .tag file is a callable JSP snippet that can
> be invoked recursively, which makes it useful in this
> instance.
Not exactly, a .tag file is a callable JSP snippet that can be invoked
recursively, which makes it useful in this instance. You didn't find that
when you researched it?
(*Chris*)
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Pratt
> > Sent
On May 23, 2011 5:13 PM, "Jason Pyeron" wrote:
> To clarify, I am not looking to render a tree widget […]
Still just a tree, though. I've also always done this with a tag that gets
passed a node and recurses as needed.
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Pratt
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 17:52
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Iterating over a tree structure
>
> You might want to look at the JSP .tag file support. I've
> used it for similar requirements before.
> (*Chris*)
Are you sayi
You might want to look at the JSP .tag file support. I've used it for
similar requirements before.
(*Chris*)
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Pyeron
> > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 16:52
> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Pyeron
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 16:52
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: Iterating over a tree structure
>
> I have been racking my brains out today on this one.
>
> What is the best way to perform a depth first traversal of a
> tree data
I have been racking my brains out today on this one.
What is the best way to perform a depth first traversal of a tree data structure
(in the view).
Ex: maps of maps of ... OR lists of lists of lists of ...
-Jason
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-
> 1) Can we test it with a struts integration test?
> 2) How can we mock the time span (ie, we obviously don't want to wait 5
> minutes for the test to finish...).
Are you testing what happens when a session is no longer a session?
Invalidate the session in your test:
http://struts.apache.org/2.2
1 ?
Beez
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
Dear all,
Today's question is on the borderline between Struts and general "good
testing practises".
I have an application requirement "users must re-login after 5 minutes
of inactivity".
Now, the way to do this is to add to the web.xml:
5
However, how does one test it? More specifically:
1
>From catalina,sh
# CATALINA_OUT(Optional) Full path to a file where stdout and stderr
# will be redirected.
# Default is $CATALINA_BASE/logs/catalina.out
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
> Why would you use S.o.p anyway? Why not jus
Why would you use S.o.p anyway? Why not just use the logging framework
that's already there?
Dave
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Pankaj Shrivastava
wrote:
> The catalina.out was getting the Struts messages through the logger. It was
> just not getting the SOP. I blew away all the log files, r
Hi,
I want to upgrade my application to Struts 2.2.3 from struts 1.1. I want
to migrate this on shared resource basis i.e. running both Struts1 and
struts2 in parallel each handling different action extension (*.action
and *.do). Though i could successfully created the Struts2 action class
and
The catalina.out was getting the Struts messages through the logger. It was
just not getting the SOP. I blew away all the log files, rolled back my code
a few versions where I knew it was working. The messages started appearing.
Again rolled forward and now they appear. Don't know what was wrong in
Who gives you this message? Eclipse? Tomcat? Could you provide some more
details?
On 20 May 2011 07:46, cuteshweta24 wrote:
> I have added the jar in the specified folder,
> still i m getting the message
> "/WEB-INF/lib/struts2-dojo-plugin-2.2.3"
>
> please suggest
>
> --
> View this message in
It should appear in catalina.out, I don't think T7 team made a such big
changes.
Ensure that the user which launch tomcat have the right access to the
catalina.out.
Another thing that it worth a try is to start tomcat in debug mode.
Anyway it's not a S2 question, you'll probably be luckier on apac
19 matches
Mail list logo
