Re: addActionError() caused "Page not found (404)".

2011-04-14 Thread Dave Newton
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Emi Lu wrote: > I mean that I agree with Aner. If I just "addActionErrorMessage", but not a > real ActionError, I would not expect the interceptor stop the workflow :-( There's no such thing as a "real ActionError". There are error messages. If there are error mes

Re: addActionError() caused "Page not found (404)".

2011-04-14 Thread Emi Lu
Hi Dave, On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Emi Lu wrote: Especially if there were no validation errors, only error messages added by the application code. By the way, I agree with this very much! So you're basically saying that you want to differentiate between two different types of errors,

Re: addActionError() caused "Page not found (404)".

2011-04-14 Thread Dave Newton
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Emi Lu wrote: >> Especially if there were no validation errors, >> only error messages added by the application code. > By the way, I agree with this very much! So you're basically saying that you want to differentiate between two different types of errors, or at t

Re: addActionError() caused "Page not found (404)".

2011-04-14 Thread Dave Newton
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Emi Lu wrote: >> 1. Add an "input" result to your config as previously stated > Do not know where/what should be set in struts.xml :-( In the action that causes the 404 because there's no input. Dave ---

Re: addActionError() caused "Page not found (404)".

2011-04-14 Thread Emi Lu
Especially if there were no validation errors, only error messages added by the application code. By the way, I agree with this very much! Emi - Aner On 04/14/2011 12:00 PM, Dave Newton wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Aner Perez wrote: This is an annoying "feature" of the Workflow

Re: addActionError() caused "Page not found (404)".

2011-04-14 Thread Emi Lu
Hi Aner, This is an annoying "feature" of the Workflow interceptor. If ValidationAware.hasErrors() returns true, the interceptor chain is stopped and Action.INPUT is returned. If you put error messages on your action, it will make hasErrors return true which will force the "input" result to be

Re: addActionError() caused "Page not found (404)".

2011-04-14 Thread Emi Lu
Hello, All right, put "input". I found this: http://glindholm.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/preserving-messages-across-a-redirect-in-struts-2/ But no one ever provide an example of where to set input feature. My situation is: (part1) browse_action1 (part2)

Re: addActionError() caused "Page not found (404)".

2011-04-14 Thread Dave Newton
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Aner Perez wrote: > It's annoying because it uses a side effect to figure out if validation > failed. > Instead of setting some flag when any validation fails and using that flag > to determine if the INPUT result should be displayed, it is using the number > of

RE: Reading .properties From Top-Level Package

2011-04-14 Thread Biesbrock, Kevin
>I wouldn't consider storing HTML in a properties file. That sounds messy. Not only does it sound messy, it looks pretty fugly, too! > I would explore using Velocity. Thank you for the guidance, sir! Sincerely, Beez - To unsu

Re: Reading .properties From Top-Level Package

2011-04-14 Thread Eric Lentz
>Before the email requirement, the information was stored in a jsp and >included where necessary using tiles. The complexity of compiling a jsp >and returning the resulting html is simply an inadequate solution. I would explore using Velocity. Struts will display a Velocity page or you can shove

Re: addActionError() caused "Page not found (404)".

2011-04-14 Thread Aner Perez
It's annoying because it uses a side effect to figure out if validation failed. Instead of setting some flag when any validation fails and using that flag to determine if the INPUT result should be displayed, it is using the number of error messages to determine if there were any validation er

Reading .properties From Top-Level Package

2011-04-14 Thread Biesbrock, Kevin
I have the following business requirement: -Include "common contact information" (i.e., the director and her staff) in a view that will also be used at the bottom of an email sent out by the same system We would like to keep the formatting of said contact information consistent wherever it

Re: Result template relative path

2011-04-14 Thread Paweł Wielgus
Hi Ilya, maybe this will help: Best greetings, Paweł Wielgus. 2011/4/11 Ilya Kazakevich : > Hello, > > I store all my jspx templates in /WEB-INF/templates// > I am tired of copy/paste like > > /WEB-INF/templates/foo/success.jspx > /WEB-INF/templates/foo/foo.jspx > > All my templates are in WEB-

Re: addActionError() caused "Page not found (404)".

2011-04-14 Thread Dave Newton
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Aner Perez wrote: > This is an annoying "feature" of the Workflow interceptor.  If > ValidationAware.hasErrors() returns > true, the interceptor chain is stopped and Action.INPUT is returned.  If you > put error messages > on your action, it will make hasErrors

Re: addActionError() caused "Page not found (404)".

2011-04-14 Thread Aner Perez
This is an annoying "feature" of the Workflow interceptor. If ValidationAware.hasErrors() returns true, the interceptor chain is stopped and Action.INPUT is returned. If you put error messages on your action, it will make hasErrors return true which will force the "input" result to be returne

Re: addActionError() caused "Page not found (404)".

2011-04-14 Thread Dave Newton
Did you try adding an "input" result and seeing if the issue went away? d. On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Emi Lu wrote: > >> I'm still guessing it's a validation thing--put an "input" result in >> there and check. >> >> Also, by naming the results the same as the actions you're actually >> ci

Re: addActionError() caused "Page not found (404)".

2011-04-14 Thread Emi Lu
I'm still guessing it's a validation thing--put an "input" result in there and check. Also, by naming the results the same as the actions you're actually circumventing one of the reasons for abstracting the result names from everything else. Even for test apps it's just not a good habit, IMO.

Re: Highlighting Error Fields through Dynavalidator

2011-04-14 Thread Dave Newton
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Sunil Choppara wrote: > Can any one tell me to how we can Highlight Error Fields if we use > dynaValidator and > Dispatch action class. I'm not aware it's any different based on what action class or form style is being used. So what do you mean by "highlight"? Is

Highlighting Error Fields through Dynavalidator

2011-04-14 Thread Sunil Choppara
Hi all Can any one tell me to how we can Highlight Error Fields if we use dynaValidator and Dispatch action class. This is very urgent for me; please post your comments quickly. Regards Sunil The information contained in this e-mail message and any attachm

Re: form action is not calling while click on submit button: Struts2.0

2011-04-14 Thread Mohamed SIDI
you can put it some where and send we back the link if it will not be intercepted again !! 2011/4/13 Biesbrock, Kevin > Ah, good point. So it's probably visible in the source, just not > interpreted correctly when displaying the email. > > > Beez > > -Original Message- > From: Dave Newto

Re: form action is not calling while click on submit button: Struts2.0

2011-04-14 Thread arun
" " -- View this message in context: http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/form-action-is-not-calling-while-click-on-submit-button-Struts2-0-tp4292686p4302460.html Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.