[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand how the codebehind or convention plug-in could provide
the inheritance and layout functionality of tiles. Moreover, we use
conventions to tag CSS to tile definitions. Can you elaborate please?
Maybe I misinterpreted your intent.
Codebehind/Conv
Dave Newton wrote:
The default value defines this behavior--you told it what to do implicitly by
not changing it.
Barring disagreement from others I'm changing the default to "none" as other
people have also had an problem reading the documentation, and personally, I also think
the default is
As I was chastised and called a 12-year old for taking this off the list, I'll
post it to the list as well. Somehow that seems a little backwards, but
whatever.
--
Taken off-list.
--- On Sat, 9/6/08, Lyallex wrote:
> Is this suppose[d] to make me feel bad[?]
> I couldn't care less what you thi
Hi to all.
I have a problem with a logic:iterate tag. I'm using Struts 1.3.
I have to populate a select with data read from db (by invoking the first
Action). When a select option is selected in the jsp, I have to invoke a
second Action (on the same jsp page) which has to perform some operations
a
Try
Regards,
Randy Burgess
Sr. Software Architect
D5 Systems, LLC
> From: Guojun Zhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:06:54 -0500
> To:
> Subject: how to import fragment page with html:??? tags into a form?
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using struts 1.
Ramanathan RV wrote:
I seem to have hit an issue with using ExecAndWaitInterceptor because of the
way it is designed. The background process is invoked in this fashion:
*public void run() {
try {
beforeInvocation();
Is this suppose to make me feel bad.
I couldn't care less what you think quite frankly.
Like I say, it's good to know this will change.
Lyallex
2008/9/6 Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> --- On Sat, 9/6/08, Lyallex wrote:
>> Um, I didn't "have a problem reading the documentation" at all.
>> I
--- On Sat, 9/6/08, Lyallex wrote:
> Um, I didn't "have a problem reading the documentation" at all.
> I just didn't read that bit.
Oh, okay. It's like a third of the page in the 2.0.9 docs, including the
snippet for changing the default, but I'll see if there's a way to make it even
more promi
I must add that the documentation is seemingly a mash-up of varying struts 2
versions (<2.1 vs >=2.1) and somewhat obtuse. I think with marked
differences in implementation, the docs should be more clearly delineated.
RTFM is fine when it exists, is complete and is accurate. Imagine the
evolutio
I don't understand how the codebehind or convention plug-in could provide
the inheritance and layout functionality of tiles. Moreover, we use
conventions to tag CSS to tile definitions. Can you elaborate please?
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Jeromy Evans <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> stanlick
... as other people have also had an problem reading the
documentation, and personally, I also think the default is
counter-intuitive.
Um, I didn't "have a problem reading the documentation" at all. I
just didn't read that bit.
But it's good to know that this will change.
Lyallex
>
> Dave
>
>
--- On Sat, 9/6/08, Martin Gainty wrote:
> Interested to know how you can make a windows binary work
> on linux is this a shared object that has been dos-compiled?
> Do you have an alias setup to associate .exe to shell to a
> mono environment?
If I understood the original poster correctly the bin
Good Morning Geoffrey
Interested to know how you can make a windows binary work on linux
is this a shared object that has been dos-compiled ?
Do you have an alias setup to associate .exe to shell to a mono environment?
Thanks,
Martin Gainty
__
Discl
--- On Sat, 9/6/08, Lyallex wrote:
> Instead of assuming I need to tell the tags what I want
> them to do I now assume I have to tell them what I don't
> want them to do ...
The default value defines this behavior--you told it what to do implicitly by
not changing it.
Barring disagreement from
2008/9/6 Jeromy Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Lyallex wrote:
>>
>> I'm starting to feel that way about Struts2,
...
>
> So, I guess you didn't notice the url tag has includeContext (default true)
> and includeParams (default false) attributes.
Er well actually Jeromy according to
http://struts.apac
Lyallex wrote:
I'm starting to feel that way about Struts2, the other day I wanted to
add some params to a url .. lo and behold the framework automatically
appended all the params available on the action to the URL ... bloody
madness. I ended up turning this ludicrous 'feature' off and doing it
2008/9/5 stanlick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Should it be referred to as intelligent? I seriously think these crazy S2
> tags are causing new Struts 2 users more pain than they are worth.
>
Well I have to agree with you here. Leaving stuff off is not really
intuitive is it.
I use Struts2 because
17 matches
Mail list logo