Re: REST plug-in & Tiles

2008-09-06 Thread Jeromy Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't understand how the codebehind or convention plug-in could provide the inheritance and layout functionality of tiles. Moreover, we use conventions to tag CSS to tile definitions. Can you elaborate please? Maybe I misinterpreted your intent. Codebehind/Conv

Re: Default includeParams value, was: Re: [S2] and Integer lists

2008-09-06 Thread Jeromy Evans
Dave Newton wrote: The default value defines this behavior--you told it what to do implicitly by not changing it. Barring disagreement from others I'm changing the default to "none" as other people have also had an problem reading the documentation, and personally, I also think the default is

Re: Default includeParams value, was: Re: [S2] and Integer lists

2008-09-06 Thread Dave Newton
As I was chastised and called a 12-year old for taking this off the list, I'll post it to the list as well. Somehow that seems a little backwards, but whatever. -- Taken off-list. --- On Sat, 9/6/08, Lyallex wrote: > Is this suppose[d] to make me feel bad[?] > I couldn't care less what you thi

logic:iterate problem: NullPointerException

2008-09-06 Thread cacodemon79
Hi to all. I have a problem with a logic:iterate tag. I'm using Struts 1.3. I have to populate a select with data read from db (by invoking the first Action). When a select option is selected in the jsp, I have to invoke a second Action (on the same jsp page) which has to perform some operations a

Re: how to import fragment page with html:??? tags into a form?

2008-09-06 Thread Randy Burgess
Try Regards, Randy Burgess Sr. Software Architect D5 Systems, LLC > From: Guojun Zhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List > Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:06:54 -0500 > To: > Subject: how to import fragment page with html:??? tags into a form? > > Hi, > > I am using struts 1.

Re: [struts] [Struts2]ExecAndWaitInterceptor and BackgroundProcess issue

2008-09-06 Thread Dale Newfield
Ramanathan RV wrote: I seem to have hit an issue with using ExecAndWaitInterceptor because of the way it is designed. The background process is invoked in this fashion: *public void run() { try { beforeInvocation();

Re: Default includeParams value, was: Re: [S2] and Integer lists

2008-09-06 Thread Lyallex
Is this suppose to make me feel bad. I couldn't care less what you think quite frankly. Like I say, it's good to know this will change. Lyallex 2008/9/6 Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > --- On Sat, 9/6/08, Lyallex wrote: >> Um, I didn't "have a problem reading the documentation" at all. >> I

Re: Default includeParams value, was: Re: [S2] and Integer lists

2008-09-06 Thread Dave Newton
--- On Sat, 9/6/08, Lyallex wrote: > Um, I didn't "have a problem reading the documentation" at all. > I just didn't read that bit. Oh, okay. It's like a third of the page in the 2.0.9 docs, including the snippet for changing the default, but I'll see if there's a way to make it even more promi

Re: Default includeParams value, was: Re: [S2] and Integer lists

2008-09-06 Thread stanlick
I must add that the documentation is seemingly a mash-up of varying struts 2 versions (<2.1 vs >=2.1) and somewhat obtuse. I think with marked differences in implementation, the docs should be more clearly delineated. RTFM is fine when it exists, is complete and is accurate. Imagine the evolutio

Re: REST plug-in & Tiles

2008-09-06 Thread stanlick
I don't understand how the codebehind or convention plug-in could provide the inheritance and layout functionality of tiles. Moreover, we use conventions to tag CSS to tile definitions. Can you elaborate please? On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Jeromy Evans < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > stanlick

Re: Default includeParams value, was: Re: [S2] and Integer lists

2008-09-06 Thread Lyallex
... as other people have also had an problem reading the documentation, and personally, I also think the default is counter-intuitive. Um, I didn't "have a problem reading the documentation" at all. I just didn't read that bit. But it's good to know that this will change. Lyallex > > Dave > >

RE: Stream Windows Executable From Linux Machine

2008-09-06 Thread Dave Newton
--- On Sat, 9/6/08, Martin Gainty wrote: > Interested to know how you can make a windows binary work > on linux is this a shared object that has been dos-compiled? > Do you have an alias setup to associate .exe to shell to a > mono environment? If I understood the original poster correctly the bin

RE: Stream Windows Executable From Linux Machine

2008-09-06 Thread Martin Gainty
Good Morning Geoffrey Interested to know how you can make a windows binary work on linux is this a shared object that has been dos-compiled ? Do you have an alias setup to associate .exe to shell to a mono environment? Thanks, Martin Gainty __ Discl

Default includeParams value, was: Re: [S2] and Integer lists

2008-09-06 Thread Dave Newton
--- On Sat, 9/6/08, Lyallex wrote: > Instead of assuming I need to tell the tags what I want > them to do I now assume I have to tell them what I don't > want them to do ... The default value defines this behavior--you told it what to do implicitly by not changing it. Barring disagreement from

Re: [S2] and Integer lists

2008-09-06 Thread Lyallex
2008/9/6 Jeromy Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Lyallex wrote: >> >> I'm starting to feel that way about Struts2, ... > > So, I guess you didn't notice the url tag has includeContext (default true) > and includeParams (default false) attributes. Er well actually Jeromy according to http://struts.apac

Re: [S2] and Integer lists

2008-09-06 Thread Jeromy Evans
Lyallex wrote: I'm starting to feel that way about Struts2, the other day I wanted to add some params to a url .. lo and behold the framework automatically appended all the params available on the action to the URL ... bloody madness. I ended up turning this ludicrous 'feature' off and doing it

Re: [S2] and Integer lists

2008-09-06 Thread Lyallex
2008/9/5 stanlick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Should it be referred to as intelligent? I seriously think these crazy S2 > tags are causing new Struts 2 users more pain than they are worth. > Well I have to agree with you here. Leaving stuff off is not really intuitive is it. I use Struts2 because