Re: Why is struts2 called struts2 and not webworks2?

Someone please correct me if I am wrong: But based on what I've read, WebWork started out inspired (or as a "fork", so to speak) from Struts to correct and enhance on what Struts did. So it kind of makes sense why it's called S2 not WW3. Ian Roughley wrote: because there already is a webwork

RE: which one is better : jstl core tag V/s struts tags (logic)

To add to that, if you're using a JSP 1.2 container (I would hope this is less likely by now), you should probably use the Struts-EL tag library instead of the base Struts tag library (although you still need both strutsel.jar and struts.jar). This will allow you to use the EL in Struts tags. On

Re: Why is struts2 called struts2 and not webworks2?

because there already is a webwork2 :-) Zsolt Koppany wrote: Hi, as far as I see struts2 has very little to do with struts1. Why is it called struts2 at all (and not webworks2)? Zsolt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: which one is better : jstl core tag V/s struts tags (logic)

--- ashish shrivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have jsp's that uses jstl core tags to iterate > through beans and display the values in html; > i am converting my application to struts. > should i also replace the jstl core tags with > struts:logic tags Short answer: nope. Longer answer: t

which one is better : jstl core tag V/s struts tags (logic)

I have jsp's that uses jstl core tags to iterate through beans and display the values in html; i am converting my application to struts. should i also replace the jstl core tags with struts:logic tags

[OT][ANN] Hands-On Flex Session in Moutain View, CA on Feb 7th

I'm guessing there are a fair number of Java web developer from Silicon Valley on this list. So, I thought this was worth sharing here. Although the primary topic is Flex, it is being discussed in the context of integrating this technology with web applications written in Java. The forwarded messa