Yes what I have in my code is exactly what is in the example. It is
not however what I am after.
What is the point of using things from the resource bundle if it only
works through 3/4 of the application?
I have the error message next to the input field, by hardcoding the
result of what would be
What's wrong with the implementation?
And, if it took my replacement a week to figure that out, I would hope
he'd have a replacement shortly thereafter :)
Frank
Josh McDonald wrote:
It's not the idea we're objecting to so much as the suggested
implementation.
But the problem is no matter h
Did you try my suggestion - I believe that will do exactly what you want -
you seem to be getting confused between the key used to store the
ActionErrors in the request (global error key) and the property under which
a message is stored in the ActionErrors.
The validwhen example in the struts-exam
Use this one: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17485
The related ticket: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38343
This class is better, simpler and leaner than LookupDispatchAction.
Michael.
On 2/16/06, Sun Shine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a page
Hi,
I have a page with multiple 'links'. One is an image
button and another is a simple submit button.
I was using a Dispatch action that maps to each one of
these buttons, using javascript to set the
methodToCall on each of the buttons. worked like a
charm until...
I was informed I cannot use j
That's not the issue, it is actually doing that, via a resource bundle
lookup (I only have one configured). I want to be able to retrieve the
error on the jsp side by getting the key via the resource bundle
similar to the way it is being added, instead of just using the value
that is referenced in
Spring can give you method-level security if you're interested in it.
http://acegisecurity.org/
It will use AOP to proxy your classes and make sure any thread has the proper
credentials to
access your code.
Paul
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?
Josh McDonald wrote:
> It's not the idea we're objecting to so much as the suggested
> implementation.
>
> But the problem is no matter how nice your implementation is, you've
> still got to maintain a list of "allowed" classes, which is fine for
> you. Unfortunately when you've moved interstate,
Modify your code to do this:
errors.add("password", message);
http://www.niallp.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/HelpTagsErrorsAndMessages.html#section5
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Cheshire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 1:50 AM
I have an ActionForm
I have an ActionForm with its own validate method that adds errors
keyed upon entries in a resource bundle, so that the errors can be
linked back to the field they are pertinent to, not just as a global
error.
String label = resources.getMessage("label.password");
ActionMes
It's not the idea we're objecting to so much as the suggested
implementation.
But the problem is no matter how nice your implementation is, you've
still got to maintain a list of "allowed" classes, which is fine for
you. Unfortunately when you've moved interstate, and your replacement's
replaceme
Because knowing the calling object might not be sufficient... you may
want to know the exact method that called, and further, you may not want
to introduce the extra parameter, which changes the public interface.
Mind you, I AM NOT saying this is a good idea or anything, but I am a
little surp
What is so objectionable about it? If you think securing a method is a
good idea (I'm not sure I do, but let's assume for the sake of
argument), why is this answer "square"? :) I don't doubt there is a
better answer, but what is it?
Frank
Laurie Harper wrote:
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
I sa
Question: How is the basic concept any different from method-level
security on an EJB? Aren't you in essence putting security on a public
interface?
I personally would tend to not block access to method either, by
whatever method, as was originally asked about... but is it really as
evil as
On 2/13/06, Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the merger of Struts and WebWork, where is the best end to start
> looking? WebWork website says WebWork 2.2 is a good start, is that the
> basic idea from the Struts side aswell?
Yes, it is.
But the proper reference would be "Action 2"
Chris Cheshire wrote:
> Thanks, I wasn't looking deep enough on the struts site - I didn't
> even see that section. I was looking for documentation links at the
> top level.
>
It's a little twisty sometimes.
plugh
-
To unsub
The short of it is you can get around public, private etc with
reflection anyway, so why slow down the entire system just because
you're under the incorrect assumption you can "force" api consumers to
do anything?
If it's that flaming important, sick the lawyers on 'em. That's what
they're for.
Strewth! I just went back and read this thread... Throw an exception and
check to see if you like the caller That makes baby jesus cry.
If you have public methods you don't want people to call, ask them not
to. If doing what you ask them not to causes exceptions and their
program not to work,
It sounds like it is time you move to the Spring Framework.
[1] Do not allow your DAO to manage transactions.
[2] Transactions are managed by manager proxies.
[3] Transaction Managers are configured to say which methods start a
transaction.
[4] Transaction Managers are smart enough to know, wi
Wow.
Why not
method(args, this);
so you know the calling object.
or better version.
register(this);
method(arg);
Plenty of OO designs.
Or just don't make it public, there are 3 "modifier" choices left other
then public, including package/friend.
I would just expose an
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
I saw a very similar question asked a few months back in a general Java
forum, and I suggested an answer that I've never had the chance to
actually try out... the theory is interesting though...
In the method you want to "protect", immediately throw an exception and
catc
Thanks, I wasn't looking deep enough on the struts site - I didn't
even see that section. I was looking for documentation links at the
top level.
On 2/16/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Cheshire wrote:
> > I am new to using Struts and I can't see how to specify the font class
>
Chris Cheshire wrote:
> I am new to using Struts and I can't see how to specify the font class
> and styles for an html:link tag.
>
> Previously I would have something like link body
>
> I don't see any equivalent thing to use in the html:link tag.
>
http://struts.apache.org/struts-doc-1.2.x/use
Yet again I have reconsidered because ThreadLocals are sort of clumsy,
and since I need these objects in the freemarker/velocity/jsp
(presentation) phase of the game, I need to clean up the ThreadLocal way
late which seems like a filter's job. All of this is just getting
obnoxious.
We extended Re
I am new to using Struts and I can't see how to specify the font class
and styles for an html:link tag.
Previously I would have something like link body
I don't see any equivalent thing to use in the html:link tag.
How do I go about this?
Thanks
Chris
-
Thanks, George. Good points.
...except I find it easier to test method invocations than Http
responses.
- Brendan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:17 PM
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re: [SHALE] Using the
Finally here are the relevant portions of the jsp code.
<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-html.tld" prefix="html" %>
<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-bean.tld" prefix="bean" %>
<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-logic.tld" prefix="logic"%>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] import="witr.domain.User"%>
<%
response.setH
I'm just telling you what I find easier.
> -Original Message-
> From: CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:51 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: Re: [SHALE] Using the Test Framework
>
>
> Although those are interesting co
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
> On Thu, February 16, 2006 4:51 pm, Michael Jouravlev said:
>
>> The last thing I can think of is a hook, a rope and some soap.
>>
>
> Why do I get the feeling this just turned into a [Friday] post?!? ;) LOL
>
I was with him until the soap, then I was just scare
zahid mohammed wrote:
> One thing which surprises me is the difference in behavior of "
> System.out.println" and the "out.println" statements. The former statement
> is printing the write set of elements on the console whereas the "
> out.println" is printing the wrong set of elements on the jsp.
Thank you!! I'll take a look at it as soon as possible.
Greg
On Feb 16, 2006, at 3:46 PM, Matt Raible wrote:
Here's a TilesListener that works for me. It could probably use some
polishing and a unit test, but it works for me.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17721
From b
On Thu, February 16, 2006 4:51 pm, Michael Jouravlev said:
> The last thing I can think of is a hook, a rope and some soap.
Why do I get the feeling this just turned into a [Friday] post?!? ;) LOL
Frank
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Does it show the proper data when you reload the page?
The last thing I can think of is a hook, a rope and some soap. Or, as
another option, get an HTTP sniffer and see what is actually
happening.
Michael.
On 2/16/06, zahid mohammed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have checked
> Tools->Internet O
Although those are interesting comments, they don't address my basic
point about the amount of effort required to mock up all those calls.
;-)
- Brendan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:41 PM
To: user@struts.apache.o
Here's a TilesListener that works for me. It could probably use some
polishing and a unit test, but it works for me.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17721
>From bug: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38255
Matt
On 2/16/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
I have checked
Tools->Internet Options->Connections->LAN settings and it does not
select anything in Proxy Server.
Yes the app and browser are on the same machine.
PLEASE HELP
Thanks.
On 2/16/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are you sure about that? Maybe your network admi
CONNER, BRENDAN wrote:
> I understand the concept; I'm just worried about the amount
> of effort required to mock up all those calls, relative to
> the complexity of my Action methods themselves. One nice
> thing about using JSF is that our Action methods themselves
> are almost ridiculously s
Cool. Actually, all joking aside, I'm anxious to learn about it.
- Brendan
-Original Message-
From: Hermod Opstvedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:35 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: SV: Re: [SHALE] Using the Test Framework
Hi
If you have not
I am not using any network "speedup" mechanisms.
If the application was'nt working in Firefox I would have thought there
might be some problem in the code, but its working great in firefox which
means there is no problem in the code.
One thing which surprises me is the difference in behavior of "
Hi
If you have not looked at Spring before: Boy do you have something in store
for you.
Hermod
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. februar 2006 22:31
Til: Struts Users Mailing List
Emne: RE: Re: [SHALE] Using the Test Framework
Sigh.
Sigh. OK, now I'll *also* look into Spring. I hope their users don't tell me
to look into something else ("Autumn"?). ;-)
- Brendan
-Original Message-
From: Hermod Opstvedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:22 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: SV:
Ok, silly question... have you run something like HTTPWatch and looked at
the request? I had a similar issue a few years back that wound up being a
proxy caching something when it shouldn't, and the problem showed up that
way.
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Tec
Are you sure about that? Maybe your network admin is using it? Check
Tools->Internet Options->Connections->LAN settings that it does not
select anything in Proxy Server.
Is your app and browser on one machine?
On 2/16/06, zahid mohammed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No I am not using firewalls/pro
Hi
Easy: Spring. It's all done with configuration. In a no "EJB container
available" setting, you configure spring to return a different service than
when you have EJB container available.
Hermod
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. fe
zahid mohammed wrote:
> No I am not using firewalls/proxies.
> In the IE options I have tried selecting the options "Every visit to the
> page" and "Automatically" for "Check for newer versions of stored pages".
> This does'nt make any difference.
>
> PLEASE HELP
>
Are you surfing using one
Or, more precisely, how do you isolate your Web layer from the EJB layer during
unit testing and then re-establish the linkage during integration testing in
your environment?
And what kind of tooling do you use for each?
Thanks,
- Brendan
-Original Message-
From: CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCS
No I am not using firewalls/proxies.
In the IE options I have tried selecting the options "Every visit to the
page" and "Automatically" for "Check for newer versions of stored pages".
This does'nt make any difference.
PLEASE HELP
Thanks
On 2/16/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Sounds good. So how do you isolate your Web Layer from the EJB layer during
testing and then re-establish the linkage during deployment in your environment?
- Brendan
-Original Message-
From: Hermod Opstvedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:59 PM
To: 'Strut
Just a quick hacked-together test:
public class test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
m1();
}
private static void m1() {
m2();
}
private static void m2() {
Throwable t = new Throwable();
t.fillInStackTrace();
StackTraceElement[] ste = t.getStackTrace();
Hi
I totally agree with Craig. There is a huge difference between Unit testing
and Integration testing. We do both, using different tooling for the
different test types.
Hermod
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Craig
McClanahan
Sendt: 16
If indeed this is a get like Frank described you can fake out IE by
passing a parameter that changes on every call, e.g.
http:/server/app/yourpage.jsp?now=<%=System.currentTimeMillis()%>
You don't have to use the argument for anything, it just makes IE
understand that it has to re-fetch the pag
On 2/16/06, zahid mohammed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> I just tried placing another with the meta tags at the bottom of the
> jsp. But it did'nt help. I am still getting the old set of elements.
>
> Please HELP
Do you use firewalls/proxies? For example, Naviscope likes to
"opti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't think you'd have to throw and catch it. I think it's sufficient
> to create an instance of Throwable to check the stack trace.
>
That is correct.
Before you could get the array (or whatever it is) of the stack trace
we'd 'print' the stack trace to a string th
Hey yeah, I think your right! It *still* may be a little heavy, but one
would definitely think less so. Off to play for a few minutes...
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM: fzammetti
Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Michael,
I just tried placing another with the meta tags at the bottom of the
jsp. But it did'nt help. I am still getting the old set of elements.
Please HELP
Thanks
On 2/16/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't know is this still relevant:
>
> http://www.htmlgoodie
Michael Jouravlev replied
> On 2/16/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In the method you want to "protect", immediately throw an exception
> > and catch it. Then, parse the stack trace and see who the
> caller was.
> > If it's not a class you want to have access to the method
Throwing exceptions has always been a somewhat expensive operation, so
certainly where high performance is a concern I wouldn't even think of
doing this. But, if it's a handful of especially sensitive methods that
aren't called all the time, it might be acceptable. Some quick and easy
tests shoul
I understand the concept; I'm just worried about the amount of effort
required to mock up all those calls, relative to the complexity of my
Action methods themselves. One nice thing about using JSF is that our
Action methods themselves are almost ridiculously simple (since the
business logic is in
On 2/16/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I saw a very similar question asked a few months back in a general Java
> forum, and I suggested an answer that I've never had the chance to
> actually try out... the theory is interesting though...
>
> In the method you want to "protect",
Hi Srinivas,
> ... can any one suggest which version of iPlanet server is accepting
struts application
> and how to deploy..
You just need to check with ur iPlanet documentation (release notes) as to
which version of Servlet specs does it support. The Struts 1.0 support
Servlet Specs v2.2. (s
CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) asked:
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 1:08 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [SHALE] Using the Test Framework
>
>
> OK, so maybe I have to learn more about the injection
> process. For all this talk about simplifying the process,
> it's starting to
On Thu, February 16, 2006 2:18 pm, zahid mohammed said:
> Thanks for replying Frank.
> Your question : Is the URL you are requesting the result of a GET, and
> never
> changing?
> Answer: No.
> Just to send a different URL I have appended a variable rand which has
> different value everytime.This i
Laurie:
Thanks for your response.
You are right big mistake !
Even if Java has pass by value, if you want to make it work like
pass by reference you need to have Valid object ( one which is
instatiated).
Also I wanted initialize method to do work of accessing Ses
Thanks for replying Frank.
Your question : Is the URL you are requesting the result of a GET, and never
changing?
Answer: No.
Just to send a different URL I have appended a variable rand which has
different value everytime.This is a part of the code
and within the javascript function (onClick fo
On 2/16/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >From: "CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > OK, I'll look at that. But, out of curiosity, how is the Shale Test
> > Framework being used by people now? Is it being used mostly for
> > non-3-tier applications? What is the ex
Oups... I didn't saw the webapps were in SEPARATE ear files... you will
probably encounter some bad classloader issues.
Do a redirect, not a forward.
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
On 2/16/06, Mineau, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We develop an application with Struts MVC. In this applica
Action path is relative to the current webapp.
What you want is a crosscontext forward, ie. :
getServletContext().getContext("/Webapp2").getRequestDispatcher("/action2.do").forward(...)
Be sure your container accept it.
Hope helps.
Mineau, Christian wrote:
We develop an application with Str
I don't know is this still relevant:
http://www.htmlgoodies.com/beyond/reference/article.php/3472881
"The Pragma statement up above sometimes fails in IE because of the
way IE caches files. There is a 64K buffer that must be filled before
a page is cached in IE. The problem is that the vast major
On 2/16/06, Mineau, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We develop an application with Struts MVC. In this application, we have
> two webApps containing some Struts Actions in each one (i.e two
> Struts-config.xml files). These both webApps are in separate EAR files.
>
>
>
>
> Example:
>
> Webap
We develop an application with Struts MVC. In this application, we have
two webApps containing some Struts Actions in each one (i.e two
Struts-config.xml files). These both webApps are in separate EAR files.
Example:
Webapp1 contains action11 and action12
Webapp2 contains action21 and actio
Ok. I meant to declare the private Product as a ThreadLocal.
So:
private ThreadLocal product;
public void setProduct(Product product)
{
if ( product == null )
{
this.product = new ThreadLocal();
}
this.product.set( product );
logger.error( "I just got a p
Set the filter="false" on jsp.
Like this...
Thanks,
Ganesh!
On 12/23/05, Carl Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am using ActionMessage:
>
>
> actionMessages.add(ActionMessages.GLOBAL_MESSAGE,
> new ActionMessage("message.key",
> parameter1,parameter1,parameter2,parameter3));
> sa
Java just doesn't work like that. See inline:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding for making Struts action thread safe you shouldn't have
instance variable in any action class. Correct ?
( it should be OK if you have read only variable ). But to make app for
flexible, so in future you can
>From: "CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> OK, I'll look at that. But, out of curiosity, how is the Shale Test
> Framework being used by people now? Is it being used mostly for
> non-3-tier applications? What is the extent of the problem space in
> which it is useful? (Obviously,
One very nice thing about WebWork and presumably Struts 2.x is the OGNL
form data scraping. RoR takes a similar approach. Though I realize
many will push back at the idea, I wrote a fairly straightforward way to
accomplish putting the form information conveniently in the Action class
using XWork'
I saw a very similar question asked a few months back in a general Java
forum, and I suggested an answer that I've never had the chance to
actually try out... the theory is interesting though...
In the method you want to "protect", immediately throw an exception and
catch it. Then, parse the stac
Tom Ziemer wrote:
Hi,
I have got a question quite unrelated to Struts: My app. is pretty much
layered, meaning, I have Hibernate, on top of which there are
SpringDAOs, on top of which are Managers that represent my business logic.
Now I wonder, if it is possible, to *hide* (maybe with annotatio
My understanding for making Struts action thread safe you shouldn't have
instance variable in any action class. Correct ?
( it should be OK if you have read only variable ). But to make app for
flexible, so in future you can change value of variable and pass it around
helper functions, I made var
OK, so maybe I have to learn more about the injection process. For all
this talk about simplifying the process, it's starting to get
complicated, but, hey, I'm flexible. ;-)
Can someone point me to a resource that would explain this in more
detail? It sounds like I have to create a bunch of alte
Question: is the URL you are requesting the result of a GET, and never
changing? If so, IE will return a cached result every time after the
first GET because it is somewhat over-aggressive in its caching scheme.
All the headers in the world tend to not help either.
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder
OK, I'll look at that. But, out of curiosity, how is the Shale Test
Framework being used by people now? Is it being used mostly for
non-3-tier applications? What is the extent of the problem space in
which it is useful? (Obviously, it's not meant for stand-alone Java
J2SE applications, because
CONNER, BRENDAN replied:
> So are you agreeing that there is currently no framework that
> can currently do round-trip testing as I've described it? Or
> am I missing something?
No, but I'm saying that you'll likely find it messy and difficult to
mock out part of a big environment but include o
Hello All,
I have asked this question before in several forums but could'nt get the
solution for it.
We have a struts application and the server is Tomcat 5.5. I display an
Arraylist (set in request) on the first page using Logic:Iterate tag. If the
user clicks next, another set is selected and th
>From: "CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Thanks for the info. I'm definitely interested in simplifying my
> testing strategy to the extent that it's possible, so any suggestions
> are welcome. In particular I'm trying to avoid having different
> versions of my delegates (one ver
Thanks for the info. I'm definitely interested in simplifying my
testing strategy to the extent that it's possible, so any suggestions
are welcome. In particular I'm trying to avoid having different
versions of my delegates (one version that returns a dummy result and
another that actually makes
Tom Ansley wrote:
Yes, I use javascript for the exact problem you mention.
Here is the code I use for the different possible formats:
That way the Form gets not submitted, and the bean does not have the latest
data on form.
It may not always be a problem, but I see it not perfect.. But i
On 2/16/06, CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Man, people are going to a lot of work to avoid ! ;-)
That is a very good point..
>
> - Brendan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:17 AM
> To: Struts User
Brendan, I think the upshot of all this is that you *may* be able to use
the Shale test framework to mock out the JSF side of things, but run the
resulting tests using Cactus so you still get the container
functionality you need. However, it's not something anyone's done so it
may or may not wo
I HARIKRISHNA wrote:
> I am working on a Struts1.1 migration project from Weblogic 6.1 to 8.1
> I have three severe issues
> 1)In my 6.1 code i have one import ::
> com.bea.jsptools.p13n.usermgmt.servlets.jsp.RealmConfigBean which was
> working fine in 6.1
> But in 8.1 i am getting the
Ashok kumar wrote:
> I am beginner for struts.now I have developed one simple
> application using Struts 1.24 with Mysql 4.1.I have created all the tables
> successfully.and Program is also correct.And I have copied the "
> mm.mysql-2.0.6.jar" into lib Folder.But it Shows some database ex
Think simple: throw some println's in RegisterAction and see where it gets
hung up. Also, have a look at this:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsLogging
That may help.
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM: fzammetti
Yahoo:
Dear all,
I am brand new user to Struts and just trying to get the first example
from "Struts in Action" working (the little user registration form). My code
looks fine and the app deployed ok on Tomcat 5.5.4. However,
when I click the submit button of the registration form, I get
forwarded
to re
On 2/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all I have a problem loading persisted values in tag.
> I have
>
>labelProperty="pathName"/>
>
>
> where allSerials is a list of MySpecialBean with getter and setter methods.
Have you already looked here: http://wiki.apache.org
Hi all,
I am working on a Struts1.1 migration project from Weblogic 6.1 to 8.1
I have three severe issues
1)In my 6.1 code i have one import ::
com.bea.jsptools.p13n.usermgmt.servlets.jsp.RealmConfigBean which was working
fine in 6.1
But in 8.1 i am getting the following exception
So are you agreeing that there is currently no framework that can
currently do round-trip testing as I've described it? Or am I missing
something?
Just trying to get a practical answer. ;-)
- Brendan
P.S. We *are* using delegates, DAO factories, etc. It just would be
nice to be able to test ou
Man, people are going to a lot of work to avoid ! ;-)
- Brendan
-Original Message-
From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:17 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [shale] datatables request scope
The datatable is actually in the request sc
Matt,
Just as an addendum, I have plans to eventually implement a listener
to handle the stuff being done by TilesServlet now. Unfortunately,
It's a pretty good ways down the list, which you can see here:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StandaloneTiles. I'm hoping very soon
to actually h
What Cactus does is allow your test code to run from within the
container, controlled by the same test code outside the container. It
connects the two with a proxy arrangement. It can call anything in your
code or available to your code.
Cactus *is* a PITA to work with, and complicated to think
Hi,
I have got a question quite unrelated to Struts: My app. is pretty much
layered, meaning, I have Hibernate, on top of which there are
SpringDAOs, on top of which are Managers that represent my business logic.
Now I wonder, if it is possible, to *hide* (maybe with annotations?) my
DAOs from al
Hi all I have a problem loading persisted values in tag.
I have
where allSerials is a list of MySpecialBean with getter and setter methods.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
