RE: executor-cores vs. num-executors

2014-07-16 Thread Wei Tan
Research Staff Member IBM T. J. Watson Research Center http://researcher.ibm.com/person/us-wtan From: innowireless TaeYun Kim To: , Date: 07/16/2014 05:04 AM Subject:RE: executor-cores vs. num-executors Thanks. Really, now I compare a stage data of the two jobs, ‘core7-exec3

RE: executor-cores vs. num-executors

2014-07-16 Thread innowireless TaeYun Kim
Thanks. Really, now I compare a stage data of the two jobs, ‘core7-exec3’ spends about 12.5 minutes more than ‘core2-exec12’ on GC. From: Nishkam Ravi [mailto:nr...@cloudera.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 5:28 PM To: user@spark.apache.org Subject: Re: executor-cores vs. num

Re: executor-cores vs. num-executors

2014-07-16 Thread Nishkam Ravi
I think two small JVMs would often beat a large one due to lower GC overhead.

executor-cores vs. num-executors

2014-07-15 Thread innowireless TaeYun Kim
Hi, On running yarn-client mode, the following options can be specified: l --executor-cores l --num-executors If we have following machines: l 3 data nodes l 8 cores each node Which is the better? 1. --executor-cores 7 --num-executors 3 (more core for each executor, leavi