l number of
> machines? When playing with the executor-cores, we have the problem
> described in (1), but the cores are on minimal number of cores
>
> 3) Playing with the parameter spark.deploy.spreadOut didn't seem to help
> with our request
>
> thanks, nizan
>
&
e executor-cores, we have the problem
described in (1), but the cores are on minimal number of cores
3) Playing with the parameter spark.deploy.spreadOut didn't seem to help
with our request
thanks, nizan
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.c