pache.hadoop.hbase.io.ImmutableBytesWritable],
> classOf[org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.Result])
>
> And if using MultiTableInputFormat, driver is not possible put all rowkeys
> into HBaseConfiguration
> Option 2:
> sc.newAPIHadoopRD
d if using MultiTableInputFormat, driver is not possible put all
>> rowkeys
>> > into HBaseConfiguration
>> > Option 2:
>> > sc.newAPIHadoopRDD(conf, classOf[MultiTableInputFormat],
>> > classOf[org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.ImmutableBytesW
ible put all
> rowkeys
> > into HBaseConfiguration
> > Option 2:
> > sc.newAPIHadoopRDD(conf, classOf[MultiTableInputFormat],
> > classOf[org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.ImmutableBytesWritable],
> > classOf[org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.Result])
> >
> >
ges into several parts then use option 2, but I
> prefer option 1. So is there any solution for option 1?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Serialization-issue-when-using-HBase-with-Spark-tp2065
mmutableBytesWritable],
> classOf[org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.Result])
>
> It may divide all rowkey ranges into several parts then use option 2, but I
> prefer option 1. So is there any solution for option 1?
>
>
>
> --
> View this mess
.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Serialization-issue-when-using-HBase-with-Spark-tp20655.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional co
