e even for other
>>>>>> functional programmers, especially if the application is distributed as
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the case of Spark. Usually no comment is provided and you have - even as
>>>>>> a
>>>>>
gt;>>>> extremes. There it depends more on the community (e.g. Medical,
>>>>> financials)
>>>>> and skills of people how the code look likes.
>>>>> However the difficulty comes with the distributed applications behind
>>>&
ve never been used to parallel programming.
>>>>
>>>> On 7. Jun 2017, at 17:20, Mich Talebzadeh
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am a fan of Scala and functional programmi
to parallel programming.
>>>>
>>>>> On 7. Jun 2017, at 17:20, Mich Talebzadeh
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am a fan of Scala and functional pro
l programming hence I prefer Scala.
>>>
>>> I had a discussion with a hardcore Java programmer and a data scientist
>>> who prefers Python.
>>>
>>> Their view is that in a collaborative work using Scala programming it is
>
,
>>
>> I am a fan of Scala and functional programming hence I prefer Scala.
>>
>> I had a discussion with a hardcore Java programmer and a data scientist
>> who prefers Python.
>>
>> Their view is that in a collaborative work using Scala programming it is
>> alm
Hence I was wondering how much truth is there in this statement. Given
> that Spark uses Scala as its core development language, what is the general
> view on the use of Scala, Python or Java?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dr Mich Talebzadeh
>
>
>
> LinkedIn *
> https://www.linkedin.com/
cala code.
>
> Hence I was wondering how much truth is there in this statement. Given that
> Spark uses Scala as its core development language, what is the general view
> on the use of Scala, Python or Java?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dr Mich Taleb
code.
Hence I was wondering how much truth is there in this statement. Given that
Spark uses Scala as its core development language, what is the general view
on the use of Scala, Python or Java?
Thanks,
Dr Mich Talebzadeh
LinkedIn *
https://www.linkedin.com/profile/vi
Hi,
If you are new to all three languages, go with Scala or Python. Python is
easier but check out Scala and see if it is easy enough for you. With the
launch of data frames, it might not even matter which language you choose
performance-wise.
Thanks,
Kannappan
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 10:02 PM
Spark is based on Scala and it written in Scala .To debug and fix issue i guess
learning Scala is good for long term ? any advise ?
On Thursday, June 25, 2015 1:26 PM, ayan guha wrote:
I am a python fan so I use python. But what I noticed some features are
typically 1-2 release be
I am a python fan so I use python. But what I noticed some features are
typically 1-2 release behind for python. So I strongly agree with Ted that
start with language you are most familiar with and plan to move to scala
eventually
On 26 Jun 2015 06:07, "Ted Yu" wrote:
> The answer depends on the
Greetings,
Even I am a beginner and currently learning Spark. I found Python + Spark
combination to be
easiest to learn given my past experience with Python, but yes, it depends
on the user.
Here is some reference documentation:
https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/programming-guide.html
Regards
The answer depends on the user's experience with these languages as well as
the most commonly used language in the production environment.
Learning Scala requires some time. If you're very comfortable with Java /
Python, you can go with that while at the same time familiarizing yourself
with Scala
Hi All ,
I am new for spark , i just want to know which technology is good/best for
spark learning ?
1) Scala 2) Java 3) Python
I know spark support all 3 languages , but which one is best ?
Thanks su
15 matches
Mail list logo
