Yes.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Paul Weiss wrote:
> So in order to not incur any performance issues I should really wait for
> all usage of the rdd to complete before calling unpersist, correct?
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Tathagata Das <
> tathagata.das1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
So in order to not incur any performance issues I should really wait for
all usage of the rdd to complete before calling unpersist, correct?
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Tathagata Das
wrote:
> unpredictable. I think it will be safe (as in nothing should fail), but
> the performance will be u
unpredictable. I think it will be safe (as in nothing should fail), but the
performance will be unpredictable (some partition may use cache, some may
not be able to use the cache).
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Paul Weiss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the behavior when calling rdd.unpersist() from
