true though I was hoping to avoid having to sort... maybe there's no way
around it. Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/ensuring-RDD-indices-remain-immutable-tp20094p20104.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at
I think the robust thing to do is sort the RDD, and then zipWithIndex.
Even if the RDD is recomputed, the ordering and thus assignment of IDs
should be the same.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:36 PM, rok wrote:
> I have an RDD that serves as a feature look-up table downstream in my
> analysis. I create
