Thanks Reynold, that helps a lot. I'm glad you're involved with that Google
Doc community effort. I think it's because of that doc that the JEP's
wording and scope changed for the better since it originally got
introduced.
Marek
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> I'm actuall
I'm actually somewhat involved with the Google Docs you linked to.
I don't think Oracle will remove Unsafe in JVM 9. As you said, JEP 260
already proposes making Unsafe available. Given the widespread use of
Unsafe for performance and advanced functionalities, I don't think Oracle
can just remove
