OK, good to know data frames are still experimental. Thanks Michael.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Michael Armbrust
wrote:
> We have been using Spark SQL in production for our customers at Databricks
> for almost a year now. We also know of some very large production
> deployments elsewhere.
We have been using Spark SQL in production for our customers at Databricks
for almost a year now. We also know of some very large production
deployments elsewhere. It is still a young project, but I wouldn't call it
alpha.
The primary changes to the API are the addition of the DataFrame interfac
I thought removing the alpha tag just meant the API was stable? Speaking of
which, aren't there major changes to the API coming in 1.3? Why are you
marking the API as stable before these changes have been widely used?
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Michael Armbrust
wrote:
> We are planning to
We are planning to remove the alpha tag in 1.3.0.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Wang, Daoyuan
wrote:
> Hopefully the alpha tag will be remove in 1.4.0, if the community can
> review code a little bit faster :P
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daoyuan
>
>
>
> *From:* Ashish Mukherjee [mailto:ashish.mukh
Hopefully the alpha tag will be remove in 1.4.0, if the community can review
code a little bit faster :P
Thanks,
Daoyuan
From: Ashish Mukherjee [mailto:ashish.mukher...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 4:28 PM
To: user@spark.apache.org
Subject: SparkSQL production readiness
Hi,
I
