Thanks, I got it !
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Spark-why-need-a-masterLock-when-sending-heartbeat-to-master-tp12256p12297.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Yes, good point, I believe the masterLock is now unnecessary altogether.
The reason for its initial existence was that "changeMaster()" originally
could be called out-of-band of the actor, and so we needed to make sure the
master reference did not change out from under us. Now it appears that all
m
