RE: Kryo is slower, and the size saving is minimal

ginal Message- From: wxhsdp [mailto:wxh...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 5:47 PM To: u...@spark.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Kryo is slower, and the size saving is minimal i'am not familiar with kryo and my opinion may be not right. in my case, kryo only saves about 5% of th

Re: Kryo is slower, and the size saving is minimal

1001560.n3.nabble.com/Kryo-is-slower-and-the-size-saving-is-minimal-tp9131p9160.html Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Kryo is slower, and the size saving is minimal

Hi, For my test case, using Kryo serializer does not help. It is slower than default Java serializer, and the size saving is minimal. I've registered almost all classes to the Kryo registrator. What is happening to my test case? Have Anyone experienced a case like this?