Thanks Matei, will check out the MLLib implementation.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Andy Twigg wrote:
> Yes, that makes sense. It's similar to the all reduce pattern in vw.
>
>
> On Wednesday, 1 October 2014, Matei Zaharia
> wrote:
>
>> Some of the MLlib algorithms do tree reduction in 1.1:
Yes, that makes sense. It's similar to the all reduce pattern in vw.
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Some of the MLlib algorithms do tree reduction in 1.1:
> http://databricks.com/blog/2014/09/22/spark-1-1-mllib-performance-improvements.html.
> You can check out how they imp
Some of the MLlib algorithms do tree reduction in 1.1:
http://databricks.com/blog/2014/09/22/spark-1-1-mllib-performance-improvements.html.
You can check out how they implemented it -- it is a series of reduce
operations.
Matei
On Oct 1, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Boromir Widas wrote:
> Thanks a lot
Thanks a lot Andy and Debashish, your suggestions were of great help.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Debasish Das
wrote:
> If the tree is too big build it on graphxbut it will need thorough
> analysis so that the partitions are well balanced...
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Andy Twi
If the tree is too big build it on graphxbut it will need thorough
analysis so that the partitions are well balanced...
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Andy Twigg wrote:
> Hi Boromir,
>
> Assuming the tree fits in memory, and what you want to do is parallelize
> the computation, the 'obviou
Hi Boromir,
Assuming the tree fits in memory, and what you want to do is parallelize
the computation, the 'obvious' way is the following:
* broadcast the tree T to each worker (ok since it fits in memory)
* construct an RDD for the deepest level - each element in the RDD is
(parent,data_at_node)
Hello Folks,
I have been trying to implement a tree reduction algorithm recently in
spark but could not find suitable parallel operations. Assuming I have a
general tree like the following -
I have to do the following -
1) Do some computation at each leaf node to get an array of doubles.(This
c