Re: Getting spark to use more than 4 cores on Amazon EC2

2014-10-22 Thread Aaron Davidson
; tasks to the slaves. > > Thanks > > Andy > > From: Daniel Mahler > Date: Monday, October 20, 2014 at 5:22 PM > To: Nicholas Chammas > Cc: user > Subject: Re: Getting spark to use more than 4 cores on Amazon EC2 > > I am using globs though > > raw = sc.text

Re: Getting spark to use more than 4 cores on Amazon EC2

2014-10-22 Thread Andy Davidson
PM To: Nicholas Chammas Cc: user Subject: Re: Getting spark to use more than 4 cores on Amazon EC2 > I am using globs though > > raw = sc.textFile("/path/to/dir/*/*") > > and I have tons of files so 1 file per partition should not be a problem. > > On Mon, Oc

Re: Getting spark to use more than 4 cores on Amazon EC2

2014-10-20 Thread Daniel Mahler
I am using globs though raw = sc.textFile("/path/to/dir/*/*") and I have tons of files so 1 file per partition should not be a problem. On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Nicholas Chammas < nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote: > The biggest danger with gzipped files is this: > > >>> raw = sc.textFi

Re: Getting spark to use more than 4 cores on Amazon EC2

2014-10-20 Thread Nicholas Chammas
The biggest danger with gzipped files is this: >>> raw = sc.textFile("/path/to/file.gz", 8)>>> raw.getNumPartitions()1 You think you’re telling Spark to parallelize the reads on the input, but Spark cannot parallelize reads against gzipped files. So 1 gzipped file gets assigned to 1 partition. I

Re: Getting spark to use more than 4 cores on Amazon EC2

2014-10-20 Thread Daniel Mahler
Hi Nicholas, Gzipping is a an impressive guess! Yes, they are. My data sets are too large to make repartitioning viable, but I could try it on a subset. I generally have many more partitions than cores. This was happenning before I started setting those configs. thanks Daniel On Mon, Oct 20, 20

Re: Getting spark to use more than 4 cores on Amazon EC2

2014-10-20 Thread Nicholas Chammas
Are you dealing with gzipped files by any chance? Does explicitly repartitioning your RDD to match the number of cores in your cluster help at all? How about if you don't specify the configs you listed and just go with defaults all around? On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Mahler wrote: >

Re: Getting spark to use more than 4 cores on Amazon EC2

2014-10-20 Thread Daniel Mahler
I launch the cluster using vanilla spark-ec2 scripts. I just specify the number of slaves and instance type On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Mahler wrote: > I usually run interactively from the spark-shell. > My data definitely has more than enough partitions to keep all the workers > bus

Re: Getting spark to use more than 4 cores on Amazon EC2

2014-10-20 Thread Daniel Mahler
I usually run interactively from the spark-shell. My data definitely has more than enough partitions to keep all the workers busy. When I first launch the cluster I first do: + cat <>~/spark/conf/spark-defaults.conf spark.serializerorg.apache

Re: Getting spark to use more than 4 cores on Amazon EC2

2014-10-20 Thread Nicholas Chammas
Perhaps your RDD is not partitioned enough to utilize all the cores in your system. Could you post a simple code snippet and explain what kind of parallelism you are seeing for it? And can you report on how many partitions your RDDs have? On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Daniel Mahler wrote: >

Re: Getting spark to use more than 4 cores on Amazon EC2

2014-10-20 Thread Daniil Osipov
How are you launching the cluster, and how are you submitting the job to it? Can you list any Spark configuration parameters you provide? On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Daniel Mahler wrote: > > I am launching EC2 clusters using the spark-ec2 scripts. > My understanding is that this configures

Getting spark to use more than 4 cores on Amazon EC2

2014-10-20 Thread Daniel Mahler
I am launching EC2 clusters using the spark-ec2 scripts. My understanding is that this configures spark to use the available resources. I can see that spark will use the available memory on larger istance types. However I have never seen spark running at more than 400% (using 100% on 4 cores) on ma