Re: Collaborative Filtering - scaling of the regularization parameter

2017-03-23 Thread Nick Pentreath
I usually advocate a JIRA even for small stuff but for doc only change like this it's ok to submit a PR directly with [MINOR] in title. On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 at 06:55, chris snow wrote: > Thanks Nick. If this will help other users, I'll create a JIRA and > send a patch. > > On 23 March 2017 at 1

Re: Collaborative Filtering - scaling of the regularization parameter

2017-03-23 Thread chris snow
Thanks Nick. If this will help other users, I'll create a JIRA and send a patch. On 23 March 2017 at 13:49, Nick Pentreath wrote: > Yup, that is true and a reasonable clarification of the doc. > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 at 00:03 chris snow wrote: >> >> The documentation for collaborative filtering

Re: Collaborative Filtering - scaling of the regularization parameter

2017-03-23 Thread Nick Pentreath
Yup, that is true and a reasonable clarification of the doc. On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 at 00:03 chris snow wrote: > The documentation for collaborative filtering is as follows: > > === > Scaling of the regularization parameter > > Since v1.1, we scale the regularization parameter lambda in solving > e

Collaborative Filtering - scaling of the regularization parameter

2017-03-23 Thread chris snow
The documentation for collaborative filtering is as follows: === Scaling of the regularization parameter Since v1.1, we scale the regularization parameter lambda in solving each least squares problem by the number of ratings the user generated in updating user factors, or the number of ratings th