Mick
--
View this message in
context:http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/SQL-Using-HashPartitioner-to-distribute-by-column-tp21237.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive atNabb
UP BY CustomerCode
>
> would not need to shuffle.
>
> Cheers
> Mick
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/SQL-Using-HashPartitioner-to-distribute-by-column-tp21237.html
> Sent from the Apache S
ode, SUM(Cost)
>> FROM Orders
>> GROUP BY CustomerCode
>>
>> would not need to shuffle.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Mick
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/SQL-Using-HashPa
)
FROM Orders
GROUP BY CustomerCode
would not need to shuffle.
Cheers
Mick
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/SQL-Using-HashPartitioner-to-distribute-by-column-tp21237.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at
, SUM(Cost)
FROM Orders
GROUP BY CustomerCode
would not need to shuffle.
Cheers
Mick
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/SQL-Using-HashPartitioner-to-distribute-by-column-tp21237.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at