When I use fewer partitions, (like 6)
It seems that all the task will be assigned to the same machine, because the
machine has more than 6 cores.But this will run out of memory.
How to set fewer partitions number and use all the machine at the same time?
--
View this message in context:
http://
Have you tried to write another similar function like edgeListFile in the
same file, and then compile the project again?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/GraphX-The-best-way-to-construct-a-graph-tp11122p11138.html
Sent from the Apache Spark Us
I think you can try GraphLoader.edgeListFile, and then use join to associate
the attributes with each vertex
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/GraphX-The-best-way-to-construct-a-graph-tp11122p11127.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mail
Is it possible to reduce the number of edge partitions and exploit
parallelism fully at the same time?
For example, one partition per node, and the threads in the same node share
the same partition.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/configurati
There is a VertexPartition in the EdgePartition,which is created by
EdgePartitionBuilder.toEdgePartition.
and There is also a ShippableVertexPartition in the VertexRDD.
These two Partitions have a lot of common things like index, data and
Bitset, why is this necessary?
--
View this message in co
I download the spark 1.0.1, but I cannot find the "PowerGraph abstraction"
mentioned in the GraphX paper.
What I can find is the pregel abstraction.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Where-is-the-PowerGraph-abstraction-tp10457.html
Sent from t