Re: [DISCUSS] discontinue 4-x HBase 1.0 releases?

2015-11-17 Thread Andrew Purtell
Shouldn't be a big challenge, the friction for porting back patches from a 1.1 based tree to a 1.0 based tree will be low. The exception will be anything touching Region/HRegion but those differences can be mostly handled with simple substitution. For CDH users, note there's also https://github.co

Re: [DISCUSS] discontinue 4-x HBase 1.0 releases?

2015-11-17 Thread Stephen Wilcoxon
Agreed. Until Cloudera moves CDH off Hbase 1.0, Phoenix should continue to support it. On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:31 PM, James Taylor wrote: > Until the CDH distro moves off of 1.0, we'll likely want to continue > releasing Phoenix on top of it (even if there are no further HBase 1.0 > releases)

Re: [DISCUSS] discontinue 4-x HBase 1.0 releases?

2015-11-17 Thread James Taylor
Until the CDH distro moves off of 1.0, we'll likely want to continue releasing Phoenix on top of it (even if there are no further HBase 1.0 releases). That's assuming our CDH Phoenix users want the new features and bug fixes we're developing. On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] discontinue 4-x HBase 1.0 releases?

2015-11-17 Thread Andrew Purtell
That's my understanding as well. On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > FYI, HBase has recently decided to discontinue the 1.0.x line. I believe > the pending 1.0.3 release is expected to be the last. > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:36 AM, James Taylor > wrote: > >> Thanks for

Re: Kerberos and bulkload

2015-11-17 Thread Gabriel Reid
Hi Sanooj, Yes, I think that should do it, or you can pass that config parameter as a command line parameter. - Gabriel On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Sanooj Padmakumar wrote: > Hi Gabriel > > Thank you so much > > I set the below property and it worked now.. I hope this is the correct > thin

Re: Kerberos and bulkload

2015-11-17 Thread Sanooj Padmakumar
Hi Gabriel Thank you so much I set the below property and it worked now.. I hope this is the correct thing to do ? conf.set("fs.permissions.umask-mode", "000"); Thanks Again Sanooj On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:29 AM, Gabriel Reid wrote: > Hi Sanooj, > > I believe that this is related to the

Re: Kerberos and bulkload

2015-11-17 Thread Gabriel Reid
Hi Sanooj, I believe that this is related to the issue described in PHOENIX-976 [1]. In that case, it's not strictly related to Kerberos, but instead to file permissions (could it be that your dev environment also doesn't have file permissions turned on?) If you look at the comments on that jira

Re: [DISCUSS] discontinue 4-x HBase 1.0 releases?

2015-11-17 Thread Nick Dimiduk
FYI, HBase has recently decided to discontinue the 1.0.x line. I believe the pending 1.0.3 release is expected to be the last. On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:36 AM, James Taylor wrote: > Thanks for letting us know, Anirudha & James. Makes sense to keep the 1.0 > branch going in light of this hard de

Kerberos and bulkload

2015-11-17 Thread Sanooj Padmakumar
Hello - I am using the bulkload of Phoenix on a cluster secured with Kerberos. The mapper runs fine, reducer runs fine .. and then the counters are printed fine.. finally the LoadIncrementalHFiles steps fails.. A portion of the log is given below.. 15/11/17 09:44:48 INFO mapreduce.LoadIncrementa