Re: OM running on lower ports

2015-04-02 Thread FJ
Thanks Mahedi. Your setting worked like a champ. Since I will be using LDAP, I like to trying to get https to work on 443 and RTMPS on 80. If you know of a setting please let me know. I am following the HTTPS/RTMPS work instruction but changing the port value around. On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:

Re: OM running on lower ports

2015-04-02 Thread Mahedi Kaysar
I did change in http only. Thanks Mahedi On 2 April 2015 at 20:08, FJ wrote: > Thank you Mahedi. Is this from from http or https configuration? > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Mahedi Kaysar < > mahedi.kay...@insight-centre.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> I was also facing problem like you that wa

Re: OM running on lower ports

2015-04-02 Thread FJ
Thank you Mahedi. Is this from from http or https configuration? On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Mahedi Kaysar < mahedi.kay...@insight-centre.org> wrote: > Hi, > I was also facing problem like you that was solved by changing two files > bellow: > red5.properties: > http.port=80 > rtmp.port=443

Re: OM running on lower ports

2015-04-02 Thread FJ
Thank Maxim, rejecting as opposed to blocking did decrease the delay noticeably. On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Or canary up firewall to reject connections to port 1935, and do it fast > > WBR, Maxim > (from mobile, sorry for the typos) > On Apr 3, 2015 12:15 AM, "Max

Re: OM running on lower ports

2015-04-02 Thread Mahedi Kaysar
Hi, I was also facing problem like you that was solved by changing two files bellow: red5.properties: http.port=80 rtmp.port=443 config.xml 443 80 Thanks Mahedi On 2 April 2015 at 19:21, FJ wrote: > ahhh, ok. Thanks Maxim. Wonder if the same behavior apply I use > https/rtmps configuration,

Re: OM running on lower ports

2015-04-02 Thread FJ
ahhh, ok. Thanks Maxim. Wonder if the same behavior apply I use https/rtmps configuration, that it would attempt 8443 first then 443 on try1. On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Code modification only :( > > WBR, Maxim > (from mobile, sorry for the typos) > On Apr 3, 201

Re: OM running on lower ports

2015-04-02 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
Or canary up firewall to reject connections to port 1935, and do it fast WBR, Maxim (from mobile, sorry for the typos) On Apr 3, 2015 12:15 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" wrote: > Code modification only :( > > WBR, Maxim > (from mobile, sorry for the typos) > On Apr 3, 2015 12:12 AM, "FJ" wrote: > >> T

Re: OM running on lower ports

2015-04-02 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
Or you can set up . WBR, Maxim (from mobile, sorry for the typos) On Apr 3, 2015 12:18 AM, wrote: > Or canary up firewall to reject connections to port 1935, and do it fast > > WBR, Maxim > (from mobile, sorry for the typos) > On Apr 3, 2015 12:15 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" wrote: > >> Code modi

Re: OM running on lower ports

2015-04-02 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
Code modification only :( WBR, Maxim (from mobile, sorry for the typos) On Apr 3, 2015 12:12 AM, "FJ" wrote: > Thanks Maxim. I am testing as root at the moment and it seems to work in > logged in using port 80. But when I start the room, there seem to be a > delay because it attempting to use

Re: OM running on lower ports

2015-04-02 Thread FJ
Thanks Maxim. I am testing as root at the moment and it seems to work in logged in using port 80. But when I start the room, there seem to be a delay because it attempting to use port 1935 then "try1" using port 80 that I change in webapps/openmeetings/public/config.xml red5httpport>80 wrote: >

Re: OM running on lower ports

2015-04-02 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
running on ports lower than 1000 requires additional permissions You can google on how to bypass that, I'm not system administrator so I can't help here you can search the list "mod_proxy" there were number of questions regarding it On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:55 PM, FJ wrote: > Maxim, I tried the

Re: OM running on lower ports

2015-04-02 Thread FJ
Maxim, I tried the red5.properties settings backoon OM2.x days and got a denied message. I read that it require root level privileges. Has that change in OM 3.x? As far as Apache proxy, where would I go to configure it once I install apache in Ubuntu? -john- On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Ma

Re: OM running on lower ports

2015-04-02 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
you can set port 80/443 in red5.properties or set up apache to proxy OM for you On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:51 PM, FJ wrote: > Has anyone gotten OM to run on lower ports like 80 or 443? One of the > challenges I face is that alot of company block high ports and so when I > sent an invite to connec

OM running on lower ports

2015-04-02 Thread FJ
Has anyone gotten OM to run on lower ports like 80 or 443? One of the challenges I face is that alot of company block high ports and so when I sent an invite to connect to my OM running either 5080/5443 or 8443/1935, they can't connect. I appreciate any input on how this can be done. -john-